MarketingVOX: YouTube recently began cracking down on questionable content in an attempt to appease advertisers, but now the video-sharing site is incurring the wrath of bloggers who think it may be going too far.
YouTube allows users to flag videos that they feel are inappropriate and bring them to the attention of the video-sharing site for possible removal. Recently, YouTube deleted a video from political blogger Michelle Malkin, although the video had been on the site for some time, the New York Times reports. The move prompted Malkin’s supporters to flock to the site to flag content that they found offensive.
The tit-for-tat flagging of videos has brought to the fore the difficult censorship task that YouTube faces. If the site is too lax, it risks allowing offensive and even illegal content to stay, which could lead to lawsuits, and fewer visitors. On the other hand, if it begins removing content based on the actions of bloggers or other groups, it risks removing too many videos, alienating its community of video contributors.
As GaijinBiker, an American blogger living in Tokyo, and a fan of Ms. Malkin, noted on Thursday, “A tit-for-tat censorship battle only leaves all of us less informed.”
Related stories:
- Google Woos YouTube with $1.6 Billion
- YouTube in Universal Music, CBS Video and Ad Deals
- YouTube Hires Its First CMO
- MySpace, YouTube Reassuring Advertisers Still
- MySpace Tops YouTube, Yahoo in Videos Streamed
- Cingular, YouTube Promote Battle of the Bands
- Yahoo Flirts with Facebook, YouTube Seeks Partner (Updated)
- YouTube, Warner Ink Music Video Pact
- YouTube Videos: 9,305 Years’ Worth Viewed
- YouTube in Music Video Talks; Suffers Outage
- YouTube’s Audience Has Grown Fourfold in Six Months
- YouTube Sued over L.A. Riot Video
- YouTube Visitors Watch 100 Million Videos a Day
- IDC: YouTube Biz Model in Trouble
- NBC and YouTube in Promo, Advertising Partnership
Related posts: