<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>MarketingProfs Daily Fix Blog &#187; Linking</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mpdailyfix.com/tag/linking/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mpdailyfix.com</link>
	<description>Opinions. Commentary. News.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 14:26:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Are You A Link Whore?</title>
		<link>http://www.mpdailyfix.com/are-you-a-link-whore/?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=are-you-a-link-whore</link>
		<comments>http://www.mpdailyfix.com/are-you-a-link-whore/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 May 2006 20:59:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Eric Ward</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Featured Posts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEO Marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Website Development and Design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Linking]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mpdailyfix.com/are-you-a-link-whore/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I received an RFP from a company that ought to know better that wanted to know how much I&#8217;d charge&#8230;

&#8230;to get their site 500 one-way Pagerank 2 or better links. Another company wanted to know how long it would take me to seed 1,000 blogs with a link to their site in the blog comment [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I received an RFP from a company that ought to know better that wanted to know how much I&#8217;d charge&#8230;</p>
<p><span id="more-11121"></span><br />
&#8230;to get their site 500 one-way Pagerank 2 or better links. Another company wanted to know how long it would take me to seed 1,000 blogs with a link to their site in the blog comment field. And another wanted to know how many links I could buy for their site for $25,000.<br />
What am I, a link whore? For the right price you think I&#8217;ll engage in sleazy link building tactics normally only used by gambling or viagra sites?<br />
Nope. And it&#8217;s not because I think I occupy some sort of high moral ground. It&#8217;s because these tactics make the Web experience worse and simply don&#8217;t work. And the sooner everyone stops being link whores, the better, in my opinion.<br />
Quit trying to fool Google already. They have enough problems with the Adsense spam that&#8217;s the Web equivalent of Kudzu. It&#8217;s everywhere.  <a href="http://www.technologyevangelist.com/2006/02/google_news_and_adse.html">Combine blog spam with Adsense spam</a>&#8230; and you have one majorly unfufilling search experience.<br />
There are many ways you can be a link whore. You might not even know you are a link whore.<br />
Here&#8217;s a few:<br />
* Do you have social bookmark accounts just to post client&#8217;s URLs?<br />
* Have you ever commented on a blog post just because you wanted to leave a URL behind with it?<br />
* Have you bought one-way links from sites that have nothing to do with your site but do have a high pagerank?<br />
You, good sir, are a Link Whore.<br />
* Have you <a href="http://www.learningmovabletype.com/archives/000577trackback_spam.php">used trackbacks just for the link</a>?<br />
* Do you have a reciprocal links page that you only created so the engines might give you credit for it?<br />
* Have you gone back to existing links and changed the anchor text just to look nice for the bots?<br />
* Do you send out press releases every week about absolutely nothing just so you can fill them with so many deep links they look like site maps?<br />
You slut.<br />
There are other far more nefarious tactics that make some link whores look like Girl Scouts. <a href="http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&#038;sa=X&#038;oi=spell&#038;resnum=0&#038;ct=result&#038;cd=1&#038;q=link+hijacking&#038;spell=1">Link hijacking</a> anyone?<br />
I&#8217;ll admit I&#8217;m tempted. Yes, even I, the so-called whitest of the <a href="http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&#038;q=white+hat+link+builders">white hat link builders</a>, will sometimes ponder doing something that is just a little slutty, like maybe <a href="http://www.digg.com/">digging</a> my own or a client&#8217;s site, or submitting to a bunch of <a href="http://www.strongestlinks.com/directories.php">legit directories</a> that few people ever heard of and ever fewer use. I&#8217;m not ruining your Web experience that way&#8230;so no harm, no foul &#8212; right?<br />
Yes and no. I can say with 100% confidence that you can be successful and rank well without having to do anything even close to slutty. I know this is the case because I have first-hand experience at it.<br />
Want to see an example? Have a look at <a href="http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&#038;lr=&#038;q=link+building+strategies">this search result</a>. The first five results are all either for me or for articles I&#8217;ve written. And I have never once in 13 years asked for a link, bought a link, swapped a link, or done any slutty linking tactic. NEVER.<br />
So how then can I possibly rank so well? Simple. Google is algorithmically rewarding my good linking behavior over the course of the past 13 years.<br />
There can be no other explanation.  Google doesn&#8217;t like link whores.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.mpdailyfix.com/are-you-a-link-whore/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>18</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

