How do these programs take into consideration longer-term customer behavior, patterns, and brand interaction in a market where acquisition is costly and retention is essential? Is it time for change?
Here’s what got me thinking: After almost six years of being on the road full-time, I entered into a reduced travel cocoon in order to focus on my personal life. I transitioned from almost weekly business travel to making trips every 6-10 weeks. Therefore, I wasn’t particularly surprised, two years later, to find that my hard-earned status with almost every major air carrier and hotel chain had expired.
I tried not to think about the years I spent in hotels and the months I spent in the air, as I anticipated this new reality. I emerged from my cocoon and began to travel again and naturally obtained fewer “free” perks and upgrades. Hitting the road as “every day Jill” was great on some levels, because it allowed me to shed my status and (at least in part) experience travel from a different perspective. This has prompted me to question many things: from what the baseline experience “should” be in the air and on the ground, and how the airlines and hospitality industry view customer loyalty as a whole.

Focusing on Frequent Travelers. For the airlines, frequent fliers with “premium” levels of status represent a small percent of total customer base. However, they contribute the most in revenue …. hands down. In fact, according one major (anonymous) airline, frequent flyers with “premium” status are worth eight times more than flyers without status. I understand that to a large extent these dynamics apply to frequent travelers in the hospitality industry as well. As such, investing in the retention of frequent travelers is where these companies get the most bang for their buck.
Differentiation in loyalty programs. We know that over time, experiences can become commodities. This is true also for loyalty programs for the major hotels and air carriers, where there is currently little differentiation between programs. As points, miles and pre-boarding have become commodities, many major airlines, like United, have launched new “products” tied to premium seating (read: legroom at front of plane). Passengers with status are given automatic upgrades to premium seating based on availability. Other passengers may purchase upgrades to premium seating for an additional fee. It is significant to note, however, that we are beginning to see seating as a commodity, as well. Airlines like Jet Blue boast more legroom for everyone. Beyond the airlines, hotels like the Holiday Inn Express, offer “perks” like continental breakfast free to all hotel guests.
As benefits become commodities, the next question is, “How can hotel and air carriers capture the affinity of increasingly “flighty” customers?” Perhaps the next field for differentiation will focus on Customer Lifetime Value.
It is only logical that customer patterns do not always play out neatly within the constraints of an organization’s “calendar year. Beyond this, research shows that customers who travel frequently are known to take periodic “breaks” from travel. Therefore, why wouldn’t it be logical for companies to build mechanisms in to the customer experience that respond to such trends and usage patterns?
For example, if at mid-year, a customer commences full-time travel, perhaps it would be logical for an airline or hotel to recognize this pattern and leverage an offer that will help “capture” as much of that customer’s travel business as possible.
Sadly, the fact remains that with most major airlines and hotels, unless a customer accumulates a ridiculous number of points beyond the calendar year, s/he runs the risk of a status downgrade at the turn of the calendar year. From a business and cost management perspective, this may be necessary at some level. However, on a psychological level, what this may communicate to an otherwise “loyal” customer is,
“Sorry. We only care about what you’ve done for us lately.”
Should you say this to a frequent traveler who has slept in one of your properties for over one year? Should you say this to a customer who has chosen your airline consistently for a decade of travel? The seasoned road warrior doesn’t need a study to tell us that this type treatment may feel slightly punitive in a manner that goes far beyond the color of the membership card.
Unfortunately, most travel and hospitality loyalty programs fail to take the natural patterns of people into consideration. Beyond this, it isn’t evident that these companies actually forecast customer lifetime value or take into consideration a value a customer’s accrued value in the establishment of loyalty programs. Unless of course, those customers accrue an incredibly high number of points….
Of course, there are some exceptions. I have to give props to Northwest Airlines and Starwood Hotels Last year, both offered to extend my hard-earned status for a year in exchange for a single flight or stay within a specified period of time. In doing so, these brands behaved as customer advocates …. doing what was right for me …. and not just what was right for the “business.” The emotional impact of the approach cannot be understated, and I did attempt to retain my status as a result. These relationship tactics made me feel appreciated and made me want to be more loyal to both companies in return.
Beyond rewarding “loyal” customers, hospitality and air travel industries will need to focus on two things in the future.

1. Offering a baseline experience that fosters repeat usage (on time delivery, guaranteed reservations, legroom, food)
2. Developing loyalty schemas that reward both short and long-term customer loyalty in a meaningful way

In the mean time, something is better than nothing. I still have some status, and I still have my points. Ultimately, the challenge remains, (especially in this tight economy) that as companies have less to give away, they must focus on rewarding “loyal customers.” Moving beyond the narrow view of a customer’s true value and taking a more comprehensive approach to follow lifecycle trends and CLV will play an important role in the evolution of the next-generation of customer loyalty programs.

I have to hand it to the two Viewzi hotshots. It’s apparent from their collections of spinach labels and IRS forms that they have been gathering material for this presentation for a long time. Strangely enough, one of the homework assignments got me thinking about the airlines’ principal marketing dilemmas: how to increase customer satisfaction and build brand loyalty.

The assignment was to more effectively organize and prioritize airline confirmation information. We were allowed to invent our own contexts. This is what it looked like:

(Thanks to Jared Farnum for scanning it.)

Unless you’re a computer, the above example is a
complete mess. The designers apparently didn’t think it was important
enough to allow people to easily find what they are likely to look for.

After all, the customer already bought the ticket. The airline got their money, and
now the passenger must walk the crucible of airport security and
undergo every examination short of a body cavity search just to visit
grandma in Chicago.

Mapping out this problem from an information design perspective requires we understand what the user is looking for. This is determined by the context of his interaction with the information.

Thinking through this, I sketched something out in class, but my work always seemed to resolve into an airline ticket. I guess that’s just where my head was, but since we were allowed, I followed that thought and came up with this rough design for the same fictitious flight:

Though I’m not much of a designer, I did a few things that Stephen and Travis recommended, and at first blush it seems to have worked out well. 

• Deleted information most people don’t need
• Grouped like information
• Prioritized the content according to the context
• Utilized icons to aid scanning

There is probably someone who thinks I shouldn’t have deleted something that I did. To that I say, with the deepest respect:

"That’s why these things shouldn’t be designed by committee. Now shut your mouth and go design your own ticket."

Kidding! Kidding! I can take the criticism. Maybe we can design a stop sign next. That isn’t the point anyway. The brand-endearing idea most useful to marketers comes next, and I didn’t even use a single logo.

If your ticket actually has it, the stub just repeats a lot of the information that was on the proper ticket, but in shorthand format and with greater emphasis placed on the seat number.

However, since these stubs are not used much anymore, I imagined what would happen if the airline decided to do something remarkable. Something memorable. Something endearing.

(The gray area in the lower right represents a bar code.)

Can you imagine printing off your ticket at the airport kiosk and seeing that message? It would be like winning a golden ticket from a Wonka Bar.

They wouldn’t have to do it for every passenger — that would be impossible. But the airline (in this case, American Airlines) under this hypothetical program would need to reserve 1-4 upgraded seats, depending on the size of the plane, on every flight, and give it to a random passenger (or group of passengers, if possible, to keep families together).

In the event the passenger was not one of the chosen few, he would be offered something else. Let’s look at these options:

• A 15% discount to a restaurant located in the arrival city.
• $3 off his next FedEx shipment, good for the entire time he’s there.
• 50% off a 15-minute chair massage upon return home.

Every one of these options can be relevant to the passenger, and the airline wouldn’t need any more information than is already on the ticket.

Even better, except for the upgrades, the airlines wouldn’t even need to pay for all of these promotions themselves. The companies who want more business from travelers would consider it an advertising expense.

It’s simple, unexpected, concrete, credible and perhaps even a little emotional. Plus, everyone who gets a free upgrade will tell his story. (Sound familiar?) Who would want to fly with anyone else?

Of course, this wouldn’t solve any management or customer service problems the airlines have. It would just build a lot of buzz and generate stronger loyalty and more paying customers.

That can’t hurt — whatever their other problems are.

What do you think?
Assuming it were technically feasible and the airlines went along with it, would it work? Why or why not?