<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Reputation Gaming with the Sybil Attack</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mpdailyfix.com/reputation-gaming-with-the-sybil-attack/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mpdailyfix.com/reputation-gaming-with-the-sybil-attack/?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=reputation-gaming-with-the-sybil-attack</link>
	<description>Opinions. Commentary. News.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 02:23:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Paul Dunay</title>
		<link>http://www.mpdailyfix.com/reputation-gaming-with-the-sybil-attack/comment-page-1/#comment-32703</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Dunay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2008 02:15:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mpdailyfix.com/reputation-gaming-with-the-sybil-attack/#comment-32703</guid>
		<description>Gwyneth
I dont have any physical examples just the urban legends I described.
sorry
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gwyneth<br />
I dont have any physical examples just the urban legends I described.<br />
sorry</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric Levy</title>
		<link>http://www.mpdailyfix.com/reputation-gaming-with-the-sybil-attack/comment-page-1/#comment-32702</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric Levy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2008 18:38:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mpdailyfix.com/reputation-gaming-with-the-sybil-attack/#comment-32702</guid>
		<description>And, indeed, the reverse is true as well.  As a frequent and long-time contributor to Gather.com, I&#039;m acutely aware that &quot;gaming the system&quot; but registering dummy accounts, IM&#039;ing or emailing friends to cooperate with you and other social engineering tactics can elevate mediocre work to undeserved levels while burying extraordinary work by honest purveyors.
Clearly, IM&#039;ing or emailing your friends is out of the reputation management system&#039;s control, but certainly smart IP filtering or awareness makes the multiple ID tactic less viable.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And, indeed, the reverse is true as well.  As a frequent and long-time contributor to Gather.com, I&#8217;m acutely aware that &#8220;gaming the system&#8221; but registering dummy accounts, IM&#8217;ing or emailing friends to cooperate with you and other social engineering tactics can elevate mediocre work to undeserved levels while burying extraordinary work by honest purveyors.<br />
Clearly, IM&#8217;ing or emailing your friends is out of the reputation management system&#8217;s control, but certainly smart IP filtering or awareness makes the multiple ID tactic less viable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ami</title>
		<link>http://www.mpdailyfix.com/reputation-gaming-with-the-sybil-attack/comment-page-1/#comment-32701</link>
		<dc:creator>Ami</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2008 03:19:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mpdailyfix.com/reputation-gaming-with-the-sybil-attack/#comment-32701</guid>
		<description>I came across some where, a person having 21 different Stumbleupon accounts. And he said it openly on his blog. And, mind you 21 thumbs up on Stumble can bring you about 1000 hits a day (or even more), for continuously for 3 to 4 days.
In my personal opinion, this not going to be long term. More and more, people are giving up their &quot;anonymity&quot; on the web and coming out with their true personality. Just like in offline society, even here on the web, the rest of the community will make sure these people get what they deserve to earn. Extinction.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I came across some where, a person having 21 different Stumbleupon accounts. And he said it openly on his blog. And, mind you 21 thumbs up on Stumble can bring you about 1000 hits a day (or even more), for continuously for 3 to 4 days.<br />
In my personal opinion, this not going to be long term. More and more, people are giving up their &#8220;anonymity&#8221; on the web and coming out with their true personality. Just like in offline society, even here on the web, the rest of the community will make sure these people get what they deserve to earn. Extinction.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Millington</title>
		<link>http://www.mpdailyfix.com/reputation-gaming-with-the-sybil-attack/comment-page-1/#comment-32700</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Millington</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2008 18:33:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mpdailyfix.com/reputation-gaming-with-the-sybil-attack/#comment-32700</guid>
		<description>Whilst this is a big issue, it&#039;s not comparable with the practices of b5media - a huge army of bloggers, who all digg eachother&#039;s articles regardless of quality just to see it rank highly.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Whilst this is a big issue, it&#8217;s not comparable with the practices of b5media &#8211; a huge army of bloggers, who all digg eachother&#8217;s articles regardless of quality just to see it rank highly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mack Collier</title>
		<link>http://www.mpdailyfix.com/reputation-gaming-with-the-sybil-attack/comment-page-1/#comment-32699</link>
		<dc:creator>Mack Collier</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2008 17:55:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mpdailyfix.com/reputation-gaming-with-the-sybil-attack/#comment-32699</guid>
		<description>Paul I&#039;m seeing more and more examples of people detailing how Digg can be gamed.  I remember Tara Hunt posted at her blog 2 years ago how TechMeme could be gamed in a similar fashion.
I think the real losers in these situations are the sites themselves.  When the ability to manipulate the results is exposed, the trust factor goes down.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Paul I&#8217;m seeing more and more examples of people detailing how Digg can be gamed.  I remember Tara Hunt posted at her blog 2 years ago how TechMeme could be gamed in a similar fashion.<br />
I think the real losers in these situations are the sites themselves.  When the ability to manipulate the results is exposed, the trust factor goes down.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael E. Rubin, GasPedal</title>
		<link>http://www.mpdailyfix.com/reputation-gaming-with-the-sybil-attack/comment-page-1/#comment-32698</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael E. Rubin, GasPedal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2008 15:33:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mpdailyfix.com/reputation-gaming-with-the-sybil-attack/#comment-32698</guid>
		<description>Paul, until you wrote the last paragraph, I thought you were going to advocate this type of practice.  I&#039;m glad to see that&#039;s not the case.
Let&#039;s not kid ourselves.  We know this crap goes on all the time, but it doesn&#039;t make it any more right or less reprehensible.  It usually has a much more malignant name -- stealth marketing.
As always, I point to the WOMMA Ethics Code and the Honesty ROI as a great starting point for any marketers or agencies unclear on why this is wrong.
Source: &lt;a href=&quot;http://womma.org/ethics&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://womma.org/ethics&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Paul, until you wrote the last paragraph, I thought you were going to advocate this type of practice.  I&#8217;m glad to see that&#8217;s not the case.<br />
Let&#8217;s not kid ourselves.  We know this crap goes on all the time, but it doesn&#8217;t make it any more right or less reprehensible.  It usually has a much more malignant name &#8212; stealth marketing.<br />
As always, I point to the WOMMA Ethics Code and the Honesty ROI as a great starting point for any marketers or agencies unclear on why this is wrong.<br />
Source: <a href="http://womma.org/ethics" rel="nofollow">http://womma.org/ethics</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Rauch</title>
		<link>http://www.mpdailyfix.com/reputation-gaming-with-the-sybil-attack/comment-page-1/#comment-32697</link>
		<dc:creator>David Rauch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2008 15:23:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mpdailyfix.com/reputation-gaming-with-the-sybil-attack/#comment-32697</guid>
		<description>Nightclubs have been known to keep people waiting in line so that the place seems popular.
Likewise, companies throttle back the supply of popular products (think Wii) to make them seem even more in demand.
Both examples artificially boost the popularity of a product. However, they are standard business practices. The tactic you wrote about however, is looked down on.
Clearly there&#039;s a fine line between scamming the system and trying to alter your image. I&#039;m just not sure what it is...
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nightclubs have been known to keep people waiting in line so that the place seems popular.<br />
Likewise, companies throttle back the supply of popular products (think Wii) to make them seem even more in demand.<br />
Both examples artificially boost the popularity of a product. However, they are standard business practices. The tactic you wrote about however, is looked down on.<br />
Clearly there&#8217;s a fine line between scamming the system and trying to alter your image. I&#8217;m just not sure what it is&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gwyneth Dwyer</title>
		<link>http://www.mpdailyfix.com/reputation-gaming-with-the-sybil-attack/comment-page-1/#comment-32696</link>
		<dc:creator>Gwyneth Dwyer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2008 15:19:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mpdailyfix.com/reputation-gaming-with-the-sybil-attack/#comment-32696</guid>
		<description>Paul, Are you comfortable sharing actual examples of a Sybil attack?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Paul, Are you comfortable sharing actual examples of a Sybil attack?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lewis Green</title>
		<link>http://www.mpdailyfix.com/reputation-gaming-with-the-sybil-attack/comment-page-1/#comment-32695</link>
		<dc:creator>Lewis Green</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2008 14:49:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mpdailyfix.com/reputation-gaming-with-the-sybil-attack/#comment-32695</guid>
		<description>Paul,
Manipulating any system sucks and is just wrong! We should earn rewards, not cheat to attain them.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Paul,<br />
Manipulating any system sucks and is just wrong! We should earn rewards, not cheat to attain them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

