<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Paying for Sustainability</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mpdailyfix.com/paying-for-sustainability/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mpdailyfix.com/paying-for-sustainability/?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=paying-for-sustainability</link>
	<description>Opinions. Commentary. News.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 02:23:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Neil Anuskiewicz</title>
		<link>http://www.mpdailyfix.com/paying-for-sustainability/comment-page-1/#comment-31303</link>
		<dc:creator>Neil Anuskiewicz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2007 21:43:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mpdailyfix.com/paying-for-sustainability/#comment-31303</guid>
		<description>It shows people are willing to pay a premium for something beyond themselves.
I signed up to pay more through my electric company for only energy from sustainable sources. I am happy to pay more for this.
Who am I to just be burning up un-renewable resources? It seems quite a conceit for me think I am more important than future generations.
I hope though, that companies do not take advantage of this because many &quot;green&quot; consumers like me do research and verify claims. There is also a lot of communication between green consumers so a company could have their rep hurt if they were found to be taking advantage of concern for the environment and future generations.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It shows people are willing to pay a premium for something beyond themselves.<br />
I signed up to pay more through my electric company for only energy from sustainable sources. I am happy to pay more for this.<br />
Who am I to just be burning up un-renewable resources? It seems quite a conceit for me think I am more important than future generations.<br />
I hope though, that companies do not take advantage of this because many &#8220;green&#8221; consumers like me do research and verify claims. There is also a lot of communication between green consumers so a company could have their rep hurt if they were found to be taking advantage of concern for the environment and future generations.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CK</title>
		<link>http://www.mpdailyfix.com/paying-for-sustainability/comment-page-1/#comment-31302</link>
		<dc:creator>CK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2007 15:39:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mpdailyfix.com/paying-for-sustainability/#comment-31302</guid>
		<description>Ah, ABC Carpet. To anyone outside of NYC it sure sounds like a drab store with a bad name, eh? (It would to me).
But it&#039;s not. Its window displays put Macy&#039;s and Saks to shame. I once bought a carpet there...but being a full-time business school student at the time, I was directed to the basement section where the &quot;remnants&quot; were ;-).
I&#039;m very interested in seeing if this trend applies to the mainstream, Andrea--and really appreciate your sharing these case studies with us. Here&#039;s my question: take Target, that gives approx. $3million weekly to local communities. That&#039;s a case where shoppers pay what they&#039;d regularly pay (as I understand) and Target takes the hit on profits and thusly, purchases are more &#039;meaningful&#039;, or give back to shoppers&#039; communities.
It &#039;seems&#039; this will be the way this trend will go (meaning co&#039;s will take the hit to profits but the ROI is both goodwill and, hopefully, more customer loyalty). So those donations/hit to profits equate to a marketing investment. VERY interested in your thoughts&#8211;I&#039;m just making assumptions here (but do hope this trend increases!).
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah, ABC Carpet. To anyone outside of NYC it sure sounds like a drab store with a bad name, eh? (It would to me).<br />
But it&#8217;s not. Its window displays put Macy&#8217;s and Saks to shame. I once bought a carpet there&#8230;but being a full-time business school student at the time, I was directed to the basement section where the &#8220;remnants&#8221; were <img src='http://www.mpdailyfix.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> .<br />
I&#8217;m very interested in seeing if this trend applies to the mainstream, Andrea&#8211;and really appreciate your sharing these case studies with us. Here&#8217;s my question: take Target, that gives approx. $3million weekly to local communities. That&#8217;s a case where shoppers pay what they&#8217;d regularly pay (as I understand) and Target takes the hit on profits and thusly, purchases are more &#8216;meaningful&#8217;, or give back to shoppers&#8217; communities.<br />
It &#8217;seems&#8217; this will be the way this trend will go (meaning co&#8217;s will take the hit to profits but the ROI is both goodwill and, hopefully, more customer loyalty). So those donations/hit to profits equate to a marketing investment. VERY interested in your thoughts&ndash;I&#8217;m just making assumptions here (but do hope this trend increases!).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

