Despite this past year’s disastrous repackaging effort by Pepsico for its top-selling Tropicana juice brand, it appears that Coca-Cola is poised to intro its own repackaged juice brand: Minute Maid. Recent events might give some companies pause, but not the intrepid Coca-Cola. According to Coca-Cola, the refreshed packaging will enable the company to unify its many juice brands around the globe, including Minute Maid, Del Valle, Andina and Cappy. Makes sense.
While contemporizing packaging is routinely executed by consumer product companies, the end result is not always good.
Lest anyone forgot in the consumer-sphere, Tropicana rolled out its refreshed packaging this past winter to a chorus of “boos” from its customers. The new packaging totally disregarded Tropicana’s equitable brand assets. The “straw punctured orange” mnemonic device conveying “100 % real orange juice” totally disappeared.
The visual brand assets that distinguished Tropicana were traded for a generic, minimalistic, trendy package design. In barely over a month, Tropicana’s refreshed packaging was scrapped due to consumer discontent and lost sales; the traditional packaging was quickly reinstated.
But don’t just take that from me, according to a recent article in Advertising Age, “Coca-Cola Juices Get Ready for a New Look”, “Sales of the Tropicana Pure Premium line plummeted 20% between January 1 and February 22, costing the brand tens of millions of dollars.” (Note: You will need to login to read the AdAge article.)
The debacle saw double digit sales increases for Minute Maid during that same period. Was Coke’s brand the beneficiary of the Tropicana debacle? You bet it was.
For people who don’t realize just how important heritage packaging is to brands, and how packaging refreshes need to be done carefully while maintaining important brand equities, this case study should be an eye opener.
No doubt Coca-Cola doesn’t intend to replicate the Tropicana miscue. According to Venkatesh Kini, VP of Marketing at the global juice center for Coca-Cola observed that his company “has been testing package designs with consumers for nearly two years, identifying those key equity items it shouldn’t change.”
Guy Wollaert, general manager at the global juice center: “Based on the research we’ve done, we’re quite confident we’re on target. It’s been amazing, the consistency in the brand equity cues.”
The new Minute Maid packaging features fruit fresh from the trees with a sliced piece resting on top of whole fruit. The brand identity is strong and dominant. Beneath that, a vertical swath of color with the fruit variety appears. At the bottom of the front panel, a green vertical bar states: “100% Pure Squeezed Orange Juice.”
Putting the focus on the considerable equities of the Minute Maid brand and freshly squeezed 100% fruit should work for Coca-Cola. The new design has stronger shelf appeal while communicating the product’s key assets, as well as each variety, simply and cleanly.
A collaborative effort between the company’s own in-house design staff and outside design consultancies helps ensure balance between brand equity maintenance and creative that contemporizes and stretches the brand.
As ever, the consumer will vote on the new packaging with their wallets.
Questions:
- Have you ever been put off by refreshed packaging on a brand you like to buy? If so, which one?
- Have you been more likely to purchase a specific brand because revitalized packaging attracted you and made it easier to shop the brand and find the right variety? If so, which one?
- In general, which companies do you think do a good job communicating their brand’s assets to you via their packaging? Which leave something to be desired, in your view?
I’d love to hear from you.

Hi Ted, the ad age article mentioned, “Sales of the Tropicana Pure Premium line plummeted 20% between January 1 and February 22, costing the brand tens of millions of dollars.” Do they solely attribute this to the package redesign? People could not find their favorite Tropicana? Were customers “that” confused or irritated? Seems like a pretty big revenue drop to solely attribute to a bad redesign. Thoughts?
Hi Paul,
Thanks for weighing in. As usual, I enjoy your thoughtful questions. You know, I do believe the poor packaging refresh had a lot to do with Tropicana’s drop in sales. Legions of faithful consumers registered their discontent via mail, email and phone calls to Tropicana HQ. How often do large numbers of consumers move on an issue in such large numbers these days? As a fan of the product line, I have to tell you it was almost impossible for me to find my favorite variety. Not good.
Now, do I think the huge drop in revenue only related to the package redesign? I do believe it played a huge part in it. The packaging was so watered down and generic, it didn’t relate to the brand at all. Having said that, the economy may have played a part, too. Tropicana, as a premium brand, may have lost some sales to cheaper competitors since consumers are shopping for bargains these days. Still, the package redesign created a huge disconnect with loyal customers and they did not hesitate to register their displeasure with their wallets.
I’m put off by the whole thing. I’d rather have companies invest in making their products better. And if the product is already as good as it needs to be then invest in new products. Or in ancillary services.
If the only arrows you have left in your quiver are the sizzle and you’ve got no steak left, then I’d prefer you just went out of business and made room for people with more creativity, vision and imagination.
Hi Adam,
Thanks for weighing in here with your observations. I appreciate it. To some extent, you’re right. It’s very important for consumer product companies to focus on continually upgrading products with innovative features and better quality. Having said that, contemporizing packaging is important too. Every product competes in the marketplace and in order to remain relevant, packaging has to evolve to “speak” to fast-changing consumers.
Let’s remember: the sizzle and the smell attract you to a good steak first. With the overwhelming number of choices in every product category, brand packaging is essential to attract the consumer. The role of marketing campaigns is to create awareness for brands. Advertising leads consumers into retail environments. But ultimately, packaging has to convince the consumer in the final seconds at the retail shelf, to actually make the purchase.
Hi Rennell,
Thank you for commenting on my post. You didn’t mention why you prefer Coca Cola products over Pepsico? Do the beverages themselves taste better to you? Are you more attracted to them and try them due to the packaging? Just curious. . .