<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Guy Kawasaki on Making Blogs More Viral</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mpdailyfix.com/guy-kawasaki-on-making-blogs-more-viral/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mpdailyfix.com/guy-kawasaki-on-making-blogs-more-viral/?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=guy-kawasaki-on-making-blogs-more-viral</link>
	<description>Opinions. Commentary. News.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 02:23:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: jennifer jones</title>
		<link>http://www.mpdailyfix.com/guy-kawasaki-on-making-blogs-more-viral/comment-page-1/#comment-29159</link>
		<dc:creator>jennifer jones</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jul 2007 08:00:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mpdailyfix.com/guy-kawasaki-on-making-blogs-more-viral/#comment-29159</guid>
		<description>Pramod: glad you weighed in.
i had not heard the term blogging karma, thanks for sharing it.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pramod: glad you weighed in.<br />
i had not heard the term blogging karma, thanks for sharing it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pramod</title>
		<link>http://www.mpdailyfix.com/guy-kawasaki-on-making-blogs-more-viral/comment-page-1/#comment-29158</link>
		<dc:creator>Pramod</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jul 2007 07:16:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mpdailyfix.com/guy-kawasaki-on-making-blogs-more-viral/#comment-29158</guid>
		<description>Hi Jennifer and Mack
The discussion that you have raised here is very interesting. Infact, another popular term &quot;Blogging Karma&quot; is doing the rounds. Blogging Karma emphasises that only by being a genuine and active member of the blogging community, one can expect his/her own blog to be noticed. A theory similar to Newton&#039;s 3rd law.
But if you ask me interms of priority, I think its the content: or else being just a good blogging colleague is of no use. Repeat visits can happen only when content is interesting and opens the reader to a new possibility.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Jennifer and Mack<br />
The discussion that you have raised here is very interesting. Infact, another popular term &#8220;Blogging Karma&#8221; is doing the rounds. Blogging Karma emphasises that only by being a genuine and active member of the blogging community, one can expect his/her own blog to be noticed. A theory similar to Newton&#8217;s 3rd law.<br />
But if you ask me interms of priority, I think its the content: or else being just a good blogging colleague is of no use. Repeat visits can happen only when content is interesting and opens the reader to a new possibility.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jennifer jones</title>
		<link>http://www.mpdailyfix.com/guy-kawasaki-on-making-blogs-more-viral/comment-page-1/#comment-29157</link>
		<dc:creator>jennifer jones</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2007 22:24:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mpdailyfix.com/guy-kawasaki-on-making-blogs-more-viral/#comment-29157</guid>
		<description>Hi Mack: Thanks for the welcome. You raise a very good point about being a community member, and I would say that both content and community membership is important. My point about content was that I do think
there has to be a point of view on a blog, and to me it has to offer some thoughts that give people some sort of &quot;ah-ha&quot;. The community aspect is key though too. I like that you think it is more important. The phrase: Community kingdom...like that!
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Mack: Thanks for the welcome. You raise a very good point about being a community member, and I would say that both content and community membership is important. My point about content was that I do think<br />
there has to be a point of view on a blog, and to me it has to offer some thoughts that give people some sort of &#8220;ah-ha&#8221;. The community aspect is key though too. I like that you think it is more important. The phrase: Community kingdom&#8230;like that!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mack Collier</title>
		<link>http://www.mpdailyfix.com/guy-kawasaki-on-making-blogs-more-viral/comment-page-1/#comment-29156</link>
		<dc:creator>Mack Collier</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2007 16:13:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mpdailyfix.com/guy-kawasaki-on-making-blogs-more-viral/#comment-29156</guid>
		<description>Jennifer welcome to Daily Fix!  Now I&#039;m going to have to disagree with you ;)  I think that a blog definitely has to have content that the reader can find value in, but that&#039;s far from enough.  Let&#039;s assume that Paul&#039;s figures are right, and that only 5-10% of the blogs out there have decent content.  Let&#039;s also restrict the discussion to the roughly 100 million blogs that Technorati tracks.
That means that there are 5-10 million blogs out there that have good content.  That&#039;s an awful lot of blogs to wade through, and even if we become more restrictive and say that only 50,000-100,000 of those blogs have amazing content, that&#039;s still means that we&#039;ll never read many of these blogs.
So I don&#039;t think that producing great content is enough to make a blog popular.  I think the key is to produce good content, but more importantly, to be a good community member.  To leave your blog and comment on other blogs, to develop relationships with your fellow bloggers.  To join discussions on their blogs.
I think this serves two very important functions:
1 - It gets the word out about your blog.  You don&#039;t have time to go out and look for my blog, no matter how great it is.  But if I come to YOUR blog and leave a comment, the odds that you will follow me back to check out MY blog, increases greatly.
2 - Participating in discussions on other blogs makes me smarter.  I get to learn from other bloggers, and that makes the content that I create on my blog, even better.
While I agree that you have to produce great content, I think being a good community member is more important.  That helps get the word out about your blog, and it makes you a smarter blogger, which leads to your creating better content.  Mike Sansone had a great thought a few months ago at Converstations, saying that if content is king, community is the kingdom it serves.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jennifer welcome to Daily Fix!  Now I&#8217;m going to have to disagree with you <img src='http://www.mpdailyfix.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' />   I think that a blog definitely has to have content that the reader can find value in, but that&#8217;s far from enough.  Let&#8217;s assume that Paul&#8217;s figures are right, and that only 5-10% of the blogs out there have decent content.  Let&#8217;s also restrict the discussion to the roughly 100 million blogs that Technorati tracks.<br />
That means that there are 5-10 million blogs out there that have good content.  That&#8217;s an awful lot of blogs to wade through, and even if we become more restrictive and say that only 50,000-100,000 of those blogs have amazing content, that&#8217;s still means that we&#8217;ll never read many of these blogs.<br />
So I don&#8217;t think that producing great content is enough to make a blog popular.  I think the key is to produce good content, but more importantly, to be a good community member.  To leave your blog and comment on other blogs, to develop relationships with your fellow bloggers.  To join discussions on their blogs.<br />
I think this serves two very important functions:<br />
1 &#8211; It gets the word out about your blog.  You don&#8217;t have time to go out and look for my blog, no matter how great it is.  But if I come to YOUR blog and leave a comment, the odds that you will follow me back to check out MY blog, increases greatly.<br />
2 &#8211; Participating in discussions on other blogs makes me smarter.  I get to learn from other bloggers, and that makes the content that I create on my blog, even better.<br />
While I agree that you have to produce great content, I think being a good community member is more important.  That helps get the word out about your blog, and it makes you a smarter blogger, which leads to your creating better content.  Mike Sansone had a great thought a few months ago at Converstations, saying that if content is king, community is the kingdom it serves.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Barsch</title>
		<link>http://www.mpdailyfix.com/guy-kawasaki-on-making-blogs-more-viral/comment-page-1/#comment-29155</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Barsch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2007 13:58:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mpdailyfix.com/guy-kawasaki-on-making-blogs-more-viral/#comment-29155</guid>
		<description>Jennifer, my take is 90-95% of blog&#039;s don&#039;t have content worth discussing. Is that harsh? Maybe.
Btw, welcome to the FIX!
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jennifer, my take is 90-95% of blog&#8217;s don&#8217;t have content worth discussing. Is that harsh? Maybe.<br />
Btw, welcome to the FIX!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

