<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Five Key Characteristics of Web Brands</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mpdailyfix.com/five-key-characteristics-of-web-brands/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mpdailyfix.com/five-key-characteristics-of-web-brands/?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=five-key-characteristics-of-web-brands</link>
	<description>Opinions. Commentary. News.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 02:23:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Wade Armstrong</title>
		<link>http://www.mpdailyfix.com/five-key-characteristics-of-web-brands/comment-page-1/#comment-27364</link>
		<dc:creator>Wade Armstrong</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 May 2007 02:17:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mpdailyfix.com/five-key-characteristics-of-web-brands/#comment-27364</guid>
		<description>From this, Web brands sound very immediate -- related to the problem at hand, solutions to the problem at hand, and reliable on the measures that customers most value. Is this a side effect of the low switching costs for many Web sites? If customers can move easily to a competitor, then you need to be there, now, in the customer&#039;s brain, or you lose. That requires high performance on all your metrics.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From this, Web brands sound very immediate &#8212; related to the problem at hand, solutions to the problem at hand, and reliable on the measures that customers most value. Is this a side effect of the low switching costs for many Web sites? If customers can move easily to a competitor, then you need to be there, now, in the customer&#8217;s brain, or you lose. That requires high performance on all your metrics.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt Grant</title>
		<link>http://www.mpdailyfix.com/five-key-characteristics-of-web-brands/comment-page-1/#comment-27363</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt Grant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Apr 2007 18:01:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mpdailyfix.com/five-key-characteristics-of-web-brands/#comment-27363</guid>
		<description>Interesting post, Gerry. I especially like your point about web brands regarding the Web as the organization.
I was wondering however about the statement, &quot;We don&#039;t search for the fun of it.&quot; While search does have its pragmatic side, I must say that there is entertainment value in the search as well, whether it&#039;s looking up old friends or acquaintances on Google, or old tv shows and stars of a bygone era on YouTube. Although you could say that seemingly frivolous searches are still purposeful, it can&#039;t be denied that there is &quot;fun&quot; to be had in seeking and, with the help of these web brands, finding.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting post, Gerry. I especially like your point about web brands regarding the Web as the organization.<br />
I was wondering however about the statement, &#8220;We don&#8217;t search for the fun of it.&#8221; While search does have its pragmatic side, I must say that there is entertainment value in the search as well, whether it&#8217;s looking up old friends or acquaintances on Google, or old tv shows and stars of a bygone era on YouTube. Although you could say that seemingly frivolous searches are still purposeful, it can&#8217;t be denied that there is &#8220;fun&#8221; to be had in seeking and, with the help of these web brands, finding.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

