<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Experiment or Go Home!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mpdailyfix.com/experiment-or-go-home/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mpdailyfix.com/experiment-or-go-home/?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=experiment-or-go-home</link>
	<description>Opinions. Commentary. News.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 13:14:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: The boss is always right &#124; garygilliland:</title>
		<link>http://www.mpdailyfix.com/experiment-or-go-home/comment-page-1/#comment-58222</link>
		<dc:creator>The boss is always right &#124; garygilliland:</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2010 23:56:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mpdailyfix.com/experiment-or-go-home/#comment-58222</guid>
		<description>[...] From Experiment or Go Home [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] From Experiment or Go Home [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://www.mpdailyfix.com/experiment-or-go-home/comment-page-1/#comment-30293</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Dec 2009 12:07:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mpdailyfix.com/experiment-or-go-home/#comment-30293</guid>
		<description>Great article!  It really got the wheels spinning on the various ways a tool like that could be used.  Thanks!
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great article!  It really got the wheels spinning on the various ways a tool like that could be used.  Thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Larry Epstein</title>
		<link>http://www.mpdailyfix.com/experiment-or-go-home/comment-page-1/#comment-30292</link>
		<dc:creator>Larry Epstein</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Sep 2007 02:07:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mpdailyfix.com/experiment-or-go-home/#comment-30292</guid>
		<description>Your description of the HiPPO scenario is right on the mark.  We see it so often -- either the HiPPO drives decisions or, worse, you have complete organizational paralysis because there&#039;s no way to settle arguments.
But most of our customers would disagree with the characterization that inserting &quot;a few lines of javascript code&quot; is going to instantly remove IT and, for that matter, Web designers and coders from the process.  It&#039;s just not that simple.
Obviously, it&#039;s in the interest of the JavaScript-based vendors to underplay the fact that unless your content is in old-fashioned circa 1995 static HTML, the page elements you wish to test are going to require reworking.  And if your web content is generated by a back-end database (as is the case with virtually any ecommerce site), substantial work on the programming side is going to be required before your first test can be run.
I&#039;d advise your readers to take a long, skeptical breadth when they hear the words &quot;a few lines of javascript code&quot;.  Ask some hard questions, particularly about testing dynamic and database-driven content.  Then speak to a reference account and ask the simple question, how long did it take to prepare your first test?  The answer will surprise you.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your description of the HiPPO scenario is right on the mark.  We see it so often &#8212; either the HiPPO drives decisions or, worse, you have complete organizational paralysis because there&#8217;s no way to settle arguments.<br />
But most of our customers would disagree with the characterization that inserting &#8220;a few lines of javascript code&#8221; is going to instantly remove IT and, for that matter, Web designers and coders from the process.  It&#8217;s just not that simple.<br />
Obviously, it&#8217;s in the interest of the JavaScript-based vendors to underplay the fact that unless your content is in old-fashioned circa 1995 static HTML, the page elements you wish to test are going to require reworking.  And if your web content is generated by a back-end database (as is the case with virtually any ecommerce site), substantial work on the programming side is going to be required before your first test can be run.<br />
I&#8217;d advise your readers to take a long, skeptical breadth when they hear the words &#8220;a few lines of javascript code&#8221;.  Ask some hard questions, particularly about testing dynamic and database-driven content.  Then speak to a reference account and ask the simple question, how long did it take to prepare your first test?  The answer will surprise you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Avinash Kaushik</title>
		<link>http://www.mpdailyfix.com/experiment-or-go-home/comment-page-1/#comment-30291</link>
		<dc:creator>Avinash Kaushik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2007 16:14:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mpdailyfix.com/experiment-or-go-home/#comment-30291</guid>
		<description>Cam : You can totally test entire user workflows, though it requires a bit of technical creativity. A little while back I had coined a term for it &quot;Experience Testing&quot;.
(It is covered more in the book - and the blog - but I left it out here becuase I think I had already exceeded MP Daily Fix words in a post by 100% already!)
Couple ways to do it:
1) If your ecommerce platform supports it, like say ATG, then you simply create the different experiences and the platform with not a lot of work can take care of the splits.
2) You can have A/B/C versions of a page and each funnels people into a new flow (this is a bit more work but doable).
3) With the multivariate option you can still do #2 and depending on your IT complexity sometimes it might be easier using the tools mentioned in the post (becuase they do drive large amounts of IT independence and &quot;set you free&quot; to be a Marketer!).
In summary: It is possible. And I like the way you think!! :)
Emerson :  I agree that the world would be a better place if we only listened to Analysts.
On a serious note, I encourage Marketers to consider different kinds of inputs. Wisdom from Analysts is helpful. So is the beauty of not having to do a three month RFP to find out what you need. Just install a free tool. Become smart by actually doing. Ditto for calling a couple of industry players and getting them to give you a free two month trial.
Learn by doing.
Hmm... Maybe I am a marketer after all, I can come up with slogans! :)
Thanks everyone.
-Avinash.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cam : You can totally test entire user workflows, though it requires a bit of technical creativity. A little while back I had coined a term for it &#8220;Experience Testing&#8221;.<br />
(It is covered more in the book &#8211; and the blog &#8211; but I left it out here becuase I think I had already exceeded MP Daily Fix words in a post by 100% already!)<br />
Couple ways to do it:<br />
1) If your ecommerce platform supports it, like say ATG, then you simply create the different experiences and the platform with not a lot of work can take care of the splits.<br />
2) You can have A/B/C versions of a page and each funnels people into a new flow (this is a bit more work but doable).<br />
3) With the multivariate option you can still do #2 and depending on your IT complexity sometimes it might be easier using the tools mentioned in the post (becuase they do drive large amounts of IT independence and &#8220;set you free&#8221; to be a Marketer!).<br />
In summary: It is possible. And I like the way you think!! <img src='http://www.mpdailyfix.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /><br />
Emerson :  I agree that the world would be a better place if we only listened to Analysts.<br />
On a serious note, I encourage Marketers to consider different kinds of inputs. Wisdom from Analysts is helpful. So is the beauty of not having to do a three month RFP to find out what you need. Just install a free tool. Become smart by actually doing. Ditto for calling a couple of industry players and getting them to give you a free two month trial.<br />
Learn by doing.<br />
Hmm&#8230; Maybe I am a marketer after all, I can come up with slogans! <img src='http://www.mpdailyfix.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /><br />
Thanks everyone.<br />
-Avinash.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Emerson Hartley</title>
		<link>http://www.mpdailyfix.com/experiment-or-go-home/comment-page-1/#comment-30290</link>
		<dc:creator>Emerson Hartley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2007 15:08:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mpdailyfix.com/experiment-or-go-home/#comment-30290</guid>
		<description>Have you seen the Jupiter Research Report?  It stated that of all the multivariate testing players out there, Memetrics is ranked number one for a variety of reasons.  Avinash, I encourage you to purchase and read this report from Jupiter Research.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Have you seen the Jupiter Research Report?  It stated that of all the multivariate testing players out there, Memetrics is ranked number one for a variety of reasons.  Avinash, I encourage you to purchase and read this report from Jupiter Research.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cam Beck</title>
		<link>http://www.mpdailyfix.com/experiment-or-go-home/comment-page-1/#comment-30289</link>
		<dc:creator>Cam Beck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2007 14:25:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mpdailyfix.com/experiment-or-go-home/#comment-30289</guid>
		<description>I wonder how easy it would be to test not just the page layout, but the entire user workflow in this manner.
I suppose one could just link to unique pages in each instance, but it might be difficult (and costly) to do the accounting.
I left a comment on your three questions post, too. I can see why you call them &quot;golden.&quot;
Excellent work.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wonder how easy it would be to test not just the page layout, but the entire user workflow in this manner.<br />
I suppose one could just link to unique pages in each instance, but it might be difficult (and costly) to do the accounting.<br />
I left a comment on your three questions post, too. I can see why you call them &#8220;golden.&#8221;<br />
Excellent work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lewis Green</title>
		<link>http://www.mpdailyfix.com/experiment-or-go-home/comment-page-1/#comment-30288</link>
		<dc:creator>Lewis Green</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2007 13:22:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mpdailyfix.com/experiment-or-go-home/#comment-30288</guid>
		<description>Avinash,
Good post full of useful information. I particularly like the three questions. Thank you!
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Avinash,<br />
Good post full of useful information. I particularly like the three questions. Thank you!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

