<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Citizen Journalists: A Good Thing&#8230; Sort Of</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mpdailyfix.com/citizen-journalists-a-good-thing-sort-of/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mpdailyfix.com/citizen-journalists-a-good-thing-sort-of/</link>
	<description>Opinions. Commentary. News.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 00:12:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: David Reich "my 2 cents"</title>
		<link>http://www.mpdailyfix.com/citizen-journalists-a-good-thing-sort-of/comment-page-1/#comment-31471</link>
		<dc:creator>David Reich "my 2 cents"</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2007 14:10:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mpdailyfix.com/citizen-journalists-a-good-thing-sort-of/#comment-31471</guid>
		<description>Judy, we seem to share the same hopes and the same concerns about citizen journalism and sites like MowPublic.
Michael, thanks for checking in here and I appreciate your willingness to listen.  The eBay analogy is ok, but I still believe sites like yours will need to do some vetting of your own, rather than rely on readers to eventually know who&#039;s reliable and who&#039;s not.  Otherwise, you&#039;re just a giant blog of sorts, and not a real news service.
Good luck with the venture.  We&#039;ll be watching.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Judy, we seem to share the same hopes and the same concerns about citizen journalism and sites like MowPublic.<br />
Michael, thanks for checking in here and I appreciate your willingness to listen.  The eBay analogy is ok, but I still believe sites like yours will need to do some vetting of your own, rather than rely on readers to eventually know who&#8217;s reliable and who&#8217;s not.  Otherwise, you&#8217;re just a giant blog of sorts, and not a real news service.<br />
Good luck with the venture.  We&#8217;ll be watching.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Judy Gombita</title>
		<link>http://www.mpdailyfix.com/citizen-journalists-a-good-thing-sort-of/comment-page-1/#comment-31470</link>
		<dc:creator>Judy Gombita</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2007 12:55:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mpdailyfix.com/citizen-journalists-a-good-thing-sort-of/#comment-31470</guid>
		<description>At the mesh07 conference (Toronto, May 2007) an optional panel discussion was &quot;Digital Blinders - Are We an Inch Wide and a Mile Deep?&quot; One of its panelists was Mark Schneider, &quot;...the Actual News Guy at NowPublic.com. Mark was the first senior editor, new media at CTV National News, and hosted the network&#039;s Digital Desk, a daily news feature, until 2002. He has taught at the Medill School of Journalism in Evanston, Ill., and at the University of British Columbia.&quot;
NowPublic was definitely in the inch-wide part of the equation for the discussions. (Nora Young from CBC Radio was the mile-deep advocate. The third panelist, Mark Federman, was more the trend identifier, the former chief strategist at the McLuhan Program in Culture and Technology, University of Toronto.)
What I like about a platform like NowPublic is the inclusiveness/lack of gatekeeping of contributors, from a wide variety of sources. Schneider talked about how the platform allowed community activists from around the world (including developing countries) to get their stories, aspirations and concerns out to a global audience.
What I dislike about any site that relies on &quot;citizen journalists&quot; is the lack of vetted research. Plus a dearth of critical thought, which seems endemic to things posted quick and dirty, where being timely is more important than ensuring that information is factual, comprehensive and objective. I like a little more depth (if not always a mile) to my information sources, which is probably why I find the current &quot;Media Snackers&quot; meme that is roaring around a small corner of the blogosphere rather self-indulgent and boring.
I did appreciate the fact that this rather esoteric topic and intelligent discussion (all three panelists were quite thoughtful and articulate) was included on the agenda of a conference that is focused primarily on social media.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At the mesh07 conference (Toronto, May 2007) an optional panel discussion was &#8220;Digital Blinders &#8211; Are We an Inch Wide and a Mile Deep?&#8221; One of its panelists was Mark Schneider, &#8220;&#8230;the Actual News Guy at NowPublic.com. Mark was the first senior editor, new media at CTV National News, and hosted the network&#8217;s Digital Desk, a daily news feature, until 2002. He has taught at the Medill School of Journalism in Evanston, Ill., and at the University of British Columbia.&#8221;<br />
NowPublic was definitely in the inch-wide part of the equation for the discussions. (Nora Young from CBC Radio was the mile-deep advocate. The third panelist, Mark Federman, was more the trend identifier, the former chief strategist at the McLuhan Program in Culture and Technology, University of Toronto.)<br />
What I like about a platform like NowPublic is the inclusiveness/lack of gatekeeping of contributors, from a wide variety of sources. Schneider talked about how the platform allowed community activists from around the world (including developing countries) to get their stories, aspirations and concerns out to a global audience.<br />
What I dislike about any site that relies on &#8220;citizen journalists&#8221; is the lack of vetted research. Plus a dearth of critical thought, which seems endemic to things posted quick and dirty, where being timely is more important than ensuring that information is factual, comprehensive and objective. I like a little more depth (if not always a mile) to my information sources, which is probably why I find the current &#8220;Media Snackers&#8221; meme that is roaring around a small corner of the blogosphere rather self-indulgent and boring.<br />
I did appreciate the fact that this rather esoteric topic and intelligent discussion (all three panelists were quite thoughtful and articulate) was included on the agenda of a conference that is focused primarily on social media.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Tippett</title>
		<link>http://www.mpdailyfix.com/citizen-journalists-a-good-thing-sort-of/comment-page-1/#comment-31469</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Tippett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2007 01:02:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mpdailyfix.com/citizen-journalists-a-good-thing-sort-of/#comment-31469</guid>
		<description>Hi David,
This is Michael Tippett, one of the other co-founders of NowPublic.
Your concerns are valid and I share them but at NowPublic we think that the marketplace - and our site in particular - will evolve in the same way that ebay did.  We think that the community itself will regulate behavior.  If I can buy a house on Ebay from someone I&#039;ve never met then presumably I can buy a news report -  so long as the seller has a sound reputation.
Please keep the commentary coming.  We appreciate the feedback.
Best,
Michael, NowPublic.com
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi David,<br />
This is Michael Tippett, one of the other co-founders of NowPublic.<br />
Your concerns are valid and I share them but at NowPublic we think that the marketplace &#8211; and our site in particular &#8211; will evolve in the same way that ebay did.  We think that the community itself will regulate behavior.  If I can buy a house on Ebay from someone I&#8217;ve never met then presumably I can buy a news report &#8211;  so long as the seller has a sound reputation.<br />
Please keep the commentary coming.  We appreciate the feedback.<br />
Best,<br />
Michael, NowPublic.com</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Reich "my 2 cents"</title>
		<link>http://www.mpdailyfix.com/citizen-journalists-a-good-thing-sort-of/comment-page-1/#comment-31468</link>
		<dc:creator>David Reich "my 2 cents"</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2007 16:15:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mpdailyfix.com/citizen-journalists-a-good-thing-sort-of/#comment-31468</guid>
		<description>Fresh perspectives on the news would be a good thing.  My concern is how factual some of those perspectives might be.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fresh perspectives on the news would be a good thing.  My concern is how factual some of those perspectives might be.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Reich "my 2 cents"</title>
		<link>http://www.mpdailyfix.com/citizen-journalists-a-good-thing-sort-of/comment-page-1/#comment-31467</link>
		<dc:creator>David Reich "my 2 cents"</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2007 16:14:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mpdailyfix.com/citizen-journalists-a-good-thing-sort-of/#comment-31467</guid>
		<description>Fresh perspectives on the news would be a good thing.  My concern is how factual some of those perspectives might be.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fresh perspectives on the news would be a good thing.  My concern is how factual some of those perspectives might be.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Barsch</title>
		<link>http://www.mpdailyfix.com/citizen-journalists-a-good-thing-sort-of/comment-page-1/#comment-31466</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Barsch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2007 14:41:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mpdailyfix.com/citizen-journalists-a-good-thing-sort-of/#comment-31466</guid>
		<description>David, I&#039;m with you about the need for editorial control and verification. It&#039;s critical.
Where I think the impact of this idea might be is some fresh takes, perspectives from other willing contributors. A key interest for me is whether the citizen journalism will get us back to more fact-based reporting and less opinion/slant/agenda intertwined in the article content, or whether things stay the same. God forbid they get worse.
It will be an interesting experiment.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>David, I&#8217;m with you about the need for editorial control and verification. It&#8217;s critical.<br />
Where I think the impact of this idea might be is some fresh takes, perspectives from other willing contributors. A key interest for me is whether the citizen journalism will get us back to more fact-based reporting and less opinion/slant/agenda intertwined in the article content, or whether things stay the same. God forbid they get worse.<br />
It will be an interesting experiment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
