MarketingProfs

Member Login | About Us | Members Benefits | PRO Members

MarketingProfs Daily Fix Blog

Paul Williams
Paul Williams   BIO
02.20.09

Can Companies Grow From Micro to Mass and Remain Special?

If the secret of becoming big and successful meant staying small, would you stay small? Making a company bigger has a way of changing a company for the worse. There are few experienced-based retail brands that have successfully gone from small to big without losing their brand identity and specialness.



Growth requires the introduction of new priorities that often work against founding priorities. Scarcity makes a brand special. Growth – even too much of a good thing – makes it feel less special.
The secret to long term success?
Stay small, simple, and focused.
Starbucks Coffee Company has been a case study for successful, non-traditional growth. Now, they’re not only challenged with the economy, but are also trying to figure out what the Starbucks brand is. What makes it special? What does the brand stand for? A few issues seem to cause brands like Starbucks to lose what makes them special, they are:

  • Going Public Changes Priorities
  • More Isn’t Merrier – Scarcity Keeps Its Special
  • Passion Can Only Be Spread So Thin
  • Quality Trade-Offs For Efficiency

Going Public Changes Priorities

When a company goes public, its purpose no longer is to only please their customer. Shareholders now share priority. Inevitably, decisions are made to please Wall Street often with the result of watering down the experience of your customers.
The experience at a Build-A-Bear Workshop retail store is the magic of lovingly, handcrafting your own custom stuffed bear. First, choose the bear exterior you want. Then a small, red fabric heart is handed to you to kiss before putting it inside the shell. Next, your bear is filled with as much or little stuffing as you want to make it softy or firm. It is then gently stitched up, given an air bath, and registered with its own birth certificate. It is an amazing experience worth the higher price than an average off-the-shelf bear.
Build-A-Bear, to build awareness as it went public, launched an off-the-shelf line of bears at Target. The bear shell fits like a jacket that zips over a bear shaped pre-filled pillow. Yes there is still a heart, and you can fill-out papers for it. Build-A-Bear increased their awareness and availability of its product, but at the expense of the experience and the magic.
Starbucks growth (and now retraction through store closures) is resulting from the company’s drive to meet expectations set by Wall Street. While growth and success has been a wild ride, employees have felt the pressure and wondered, ‘When would the growth stop!?’ HR couldn’t find and train people fast enough. Store partners were trained in stages, the most important parts, drink making and cash handling, first… Coffee knowledge later. Poor choices had to be made for leadership to maintain with growth expectations set by Wall Street. The work to support quantity has cause quality to suffer.

More Isn’t Merrier – Scarcity Keeps It Special

When Starbucks locations were first opening, they were super special. When you visited a city that had one… you HAD to make a special trip to go there. Starbucks was a destination. This has been the same story for Build-A-Bear Workshop, Whole Foods Market, and Krispy Kreme. This was the story for the first McDonald’s and WalMart.
The way we typically grow brands in America too many makes the uncommon common. The secret to keeping it special is to restrict growth. To resist the desire to ‘be everywhere your customer wants you to be.’
There is no doubt that the delicious, high-quality In-and-Out Burger concept would be successful all across North America. However, even if they could expand without altering a single operational aspect (fresh never-frozen-beef burgers, fresh-cut fries from whole potatoes, limited menu offerings)… While we’d be happier cities with bigger bellies… In-and-Out would lose its specialness. Good for In-and-Out choosing special over more.
There is something about going to where it is versus having it come to you that makes a retail brand special.

Passion Can Only Be Spread So Thin

When a company is small, the passion of the founder can be conveyed directly to new hires. In face-to-face meetings passion, energy, and values are personally delivered. As the company grows logistics often require that passion is delegated to the HR team, motivating training videos and your boss.
Now the message is one or two levels from you. It is not possible for these facsimiles …. as good as they may be …. to convey the original spirit. So now the passion and meaning is a bit diluted… Even a wee bit, it’s still less potent.
Old time Starbucks partners told me about the energy, power, and passion at the meetings between founder Howard Schultz and the few dozen employees that launched the company. In the 90s I was there when Starbucks was still small enough for Howard to visit each city and employees in each market. By the early 2000’s Starbucks had grown so much it was no longer possible for Howard to visit all his stores or meet all his employees. Video messages were filmed and sent to store manager to view and share.

Quality Trade-Offs For Efficiency

In the begging at Starbucks…
Passionate employees handcrafted espresso beverages with skill and expertise. Milk was hand-steamed by a barista who would carefully adjust the steaming pitcher allowing just the right amount of air to make the foam thick and fluffy. The thermometer was constantly monitored to ensure perfect temperature. There was just enough milk for your serving; the next latte got the same fresh milk treatment.
Next, espresso shots were quality-tasted hourly. Grinders were calibrated to account for changes in the weather and humidity. Each espresso shot pulled was monitored to ensure it wasn’t pouring too fast or slow. And, each was visually inspected for the proper layers of heart, body, and crema. If it wasn’t right, it would be poured out and the process started again. Each barista knew how to adjust the grind to fix it. Before the shot “expired” it would be …. based on your drink type – topped with the proper proportion of milk and foam. (A shot sitting more than 20 seconds loses its freshness and begins to taste bitter. If it sits too long, it is considered expired and a new shot would have to be pulled).
When was the last time two of these steps occurred when you got a latte at Starbucks? Doesn’t that sound like an amazing place to bring a friend?
Not only is this care missing at Starbucks, customers today wouldn’t put up with the wait time required to allow that quality. Starbucks (and customers) have efficiency-ized the quality out. Speed required automation, and automation requires shortcuts.
In conclusion…
If you can stay small, keep your focus on the customer, directly infuse passion of your brand to employees, and never trade quality for efficiency you can remain special.
What do you think? What are other factors? What has been your experience? Have you worked for, or know of a retail brand that’s purposely staying small? How about a company that got big, but reined it?
(Thanks to Karin at the new Essential Orange Blog for making me think about this topic!)

Share and Enjoy:
  • email
  • Twitter
  • Digg
  • LinkedIn
  • StumbleUpon
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Sphinn
  • Facebook
  • del.icio.us
  • Add to favorites
  • Posterous
  • FriendFeed
  • Google Bookmarks

10 Responses to “Can Companies Grow From Micro to Mass and Remain Special?”

  1. Paul Barsch says:

    Hi Paul, happy thought provoking Friday to you.
    For another example, I think Trader Joe’s has done a pretty good job of managing growth and maintaining a welcoming environment for customers and employees. Granted they are only in nine states, but they seem to have a certain kind of employee they hire, which helps maintain the company culture as they expand.

  2. Paul B – I agree, Trader Joe’s has been doing a great job. I hope they will continue to stay small and keep the quality.

  3. Howard says:

    I agree, Trade Joe’s is a great example.
    I think the key is while growing, have points where people can remain connected and not “slip through the cracks.” Social media has been playing a large role in that where people are remaining connected and brands can be mass and still be approachable on a micro level.

  4. Howard – Great point. With all the forms of communication nowadays companies should use whatever means appropriate to stay in touch (inform) as well as get feedback (input).
    Thanks for your comment.

  5. Maxine says:

    Thank you for the reminder Paul. Being only 4′10″ I am always aware that small is mighty! The program at Target was very small and very short.
    Customers loved it–especially the ones who lived hundreds of miles from a BABW store but Target could not maintain the inventory and so we pulled it. It wasn’t the saturation that effected us because we were far from that, it was the poor service. The last thing I evre want is a disappointed child.
    Instead we have put our efforts into buildabearville.com and staying even more connected to our Guests. In fact, I met Guests daily on our site to talk and play games together and in return I get so much more! While we have only 350 stores in the US,CA,UK and France, I just can’t get to all of them any other way.
    Thanks for the reminder and reinforcement that being close to the customer REALLY DOES MATTER!
    Beary best regards,
    Maxine

  6. I agree. I have seen what happens to companies when they grow to quickly. All of a sudden dress codes are implemented and office moral is down. There is positives and negatives to everything.

  7. Maxine,
    As in Maxine Clark – I’m the one in charge of Build-A-Bear, Maxine!?
    A) Thanks a million for your comment. It says a lot about you and your company that you took the time to leave a comment.
    B) I think the experience of Build-A-Bear is awesome and delighting children is the business you are in.
    Thanks again, Maxine!

  8. All of these companies went from highly specialized niche markets to serving a much more generalized, sometimes incongruous customer base (especially Starbucks). The issue is that a company can not be all things for all people. The question is, as a company grows, does it have to broaden its customer base, and how can that be done without being less special?

  9. Alan Wolk says:

    Nice piece Paul.
    Sounds like you are discussing Passion vs. Greed.
    Howard Schultz would probably be a lot less wealthy today than if he had left Starbucks as a smaller chain based in upscale communities with the attention to detail you describe.
    I suspect that Schultz and the majority of business owners who go down that path embark on it certain that they will be the exception, the one who manages to go national without losing their mojo.
    I believe it was Jay Chiat, founder of ChiatDay, who always used to ask “how big can we get before we get bad?”
    At least he knew.

  10. Krista says:

    Paul: Good topic! I once worked for a company prior to its IPO. And then I was at that same company when it went public. I can tell you that the environment changed. I could feel it as a corporate communications person. When you are a public company, your every move is scrutinised. What the CEO does (and what he does not do) is news because like it or not, it affects the share prices of the company. Even employees started to be suspicious of the CEO when he gave press conferences. Eventually that company grew too big and unwieldy and was eventually sold off. The CEO resigned. It was truly disappointing because the company was touted as one of the top software companies in the Asian region. It also got de-listed from the Stock Exchange. Right now, I am running my own business. I know what it means to be small because we can control the kind of output we want as a design firm. When clients ask, why don’t you get more investors and grow bigger? You could expand, buy a bigger office etc. But growing bigger comes with a cost. And sometimes that ‘kills’ the company. I have often said that I would rather keep the company small and dedicated than go public and have people who don’t care about what we do but just care about whether the stock price is rising or falling.

Leave a Reply