I often write in this space about problem-solving techniques. I plan to do so today as well, but with a different spin. When organizing a brainstorm or problem solving session, I always recommend taking great care when selecting the team of participants. Here are some tips…
- Make sure you include experts who know all about the topic – their subject matter expertise will be critical.
- Make sure you include people who know nothing about the topic, their naiveté will help ground the conversation.
- Include those who will ultimately implement the idea. As a marketer at Starbucks, when coming up with consumer promotion ideas that would be executed by store employees, getting input from the Operations team was invaluable to success.
- Most importantly however, make sure those invited don’t only attend the brainstorm session, but that they actively participate.
Someone who sits there, not participating, has become part of the problem. If they’re not adding value, there is a strong chance they’re only adding noise.
If you actively engage and add your voice, you can consider yourself part of the solution.
What’s more, you’ve earned the right to voice your opinion about the outcome after the fact. Participation is the price of criticism.
Segue…
On Tuesday, November 4th, the United States is holding a nationwide problem-solving session.
Your role as a citizen is to be an active participant. If you actively engage and add your VOTE, consider yourself part of the solution.
If you’re not happy with the outcome and didn’t participate, you’ve lost your right to criticize.
Your vote counts. Did you know ultimately 537 votes ultimately decided the outcome of the 2000 election?
I’m sending this message to you. You should send it to five more friends…
Five More Friends
Related posts:
Learn why certain wedge issues are the focus during campaigns. View http://www.thetruthabout.com/public/294.cfm?affID=and16
So here’s the problem. This election will be decided by the 8% of likely voters who.. are… undecided.
Those with the least intellectual investment will decide who leads the United States. Unbelievable.
I’ve never been the kind to say that “everyone should get out and vote.” I think only those who care enough to understand the issues and educate themselves on the character of their prospective leaders should vote. The others can stay at home. If we could find a way to enforce a national test to separate the empty votes from the well-constructed ones, I’d be in favor. I just can’t figure out who would preside over it.
Much like problem solving, it’s best left to those who care enough about the outcome to actually offer a meaningful contribution to the dialog.