<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A Law of Motion Applied to Marketing</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mpdailyfix.com/a-law-of-motion-applied-to-marketing/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mpdailyfix.com/a-law-of-motion-applied-to-marketing/?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=a-law-of-motion-applied-to-marketing</link>
	<description>Opinions. Commentary. News.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 02:23:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: J. Richman</title>
		<link>http://www.mpdailyfix.com/a-law-of-motion-applied-to-marketing/comment-page-1/#comment-22744</link>
		<dc:creator>J. Richman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Sep 2006 02:34:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mpdailyfix.com/a-law-of-motion-applied-to-marketing/#comment-22744</guid>
		<description>A good way to look at this issue.  I completely agree that the best marketing opportunities come in situations where there is a market essentially already established, but completely underserved.  The comparison to Newton first law is a good one.
I hear far too often from collegues that they&#039;ve created the next great widget only for them to find there is no market for it.  Very few (but also a successful few) find a market and then invent a product to serve that market.  If you can find a cohesive market that you can penetrate quickly, create strong word of mouth advertising, and who is open for a solution, do whatever you can to invent something for them.  You&#039;ll be far better served opposite creating a better mousetrap for a house with no mice.
If you&#039;ve got mice traps already, then you need to rethink your plan.  Consider what else those mousetraps might be used for and if they might apply to an underserved market.  You&#039;re Bayer...you&#039;ve got aspirin (for the past 100 years).  Now what?  Talk to a new market with a new application.  Simple: take a lower dose of our product, EVERYDAY, to prevent a heart attack. Talk about an underserved market hungry for a better idea.  No one wanted aspirin for pain, but there was a market out there.  It&#039;s only a matter of finding the market and explaining why your product fits.
JMR
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A good way to look at this issue.  I completely agree that the best marketing opportunities come in situations where there is a market essentially already established, but completely underserved.  The comparison to Newton first law is a good one.<br />
I hear far too often from collegues that they&#8217;ve created the next great widget only for them to find there is no market for it.  Very few (but also a successful few) find a market and then invent a product to serve that market.  If you can find a cohesive market that you can penetrate quickly, create strong word of mouth advertising, and who is open for a solution, do whatever you can to invent something for them.  You&#8217;ll be far better served opposite creating a better mousetrap for a house with no mice.<br />
If you&#8217;ve got mice traps already, then you need to rethink your plan.  Consider what else those mousetraps might be used for and if they might apply to an underserved market.  You&#8217;re Bayer&#8230;you&#8217;ve got aspirin (for the past 100 years).  Now what?  Talk to a new market with a new application.  Simple: take a lower dose of our product, EVERYDAY, to prevent a heart attack. Talk about an underserved market hungry for a better idea.  No one wanted aspirin for pain, but there was a market out there.  It&#8217;s only a matter of finding the market and explaining why your product fits.<br />
JMR</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim Hill</title>
		<link>http://www.mpdailyfix.com/a-law-of-motion-applied-to-marketing/comment-page-1/#comment-22743</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim Hill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Sep 2006 23:44:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mpdailyfix.com/a-law-of-motion-applied-to-marketing/#comment-22743</guid>
		<description>&quot;If you&#039;ve already got a business you are trying to get in motion, then you must find a way to package what you do so that it attracts a hungry market.&quot;
You might try going after a market you can own rather than that whole market. Being part of the considered set will make people more receptive to your efforts.
I understand that to be true for b2b, is b2c different? Or could you get away without being in the considered set and just have shiny packaging? =)
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;If you&#8217;ve already got a business you are trying to get in motion, then you must find a way to package what you do so that it attracts a hungry market.&#8221;<br />
You might try going after a market you can own rather than that whole market. Being part of the considered set will make people more receptive to your efforts.<br />
I understand that to be true for b2b, is b2c different? Or could you get away without being in the considered set and just have shiny packaging? =)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

