|
This is an important question. A tribe is a group of people connected to each other, to a leader and to an idea (Godin). I opened a conversation with direct response professionals in Philadelphia last week by summarizing three timeless imperatives for marketing....
1. Cash flow is a must
2. Customers Rule
3. Do more with less
We used to look to harness the world of opportunity (we think is) in the marketplace as a funnel, with our product and service as the point of view.
We still organize promotions using that concept - it’s a comfortable place where we feel in control. While it’s useful to still use the metaphor as the process, things have changed considerably in the middle of the funnel in recent times. Brand relationships and preference are now formed prevalently via exposure to interpersonal exchanges - people talking with people.
No, we are not in control by a long shot, but why should we dwell on that when there is still so much opportunity still? The opportunity is that to lead with ideas the market wants - and businesses built around connecting customers with each other.
I don’t think this necessarily means starting a news business as much as putting your ear to the ground and figuring out what about your business can be or is an idea that connects with your customers. Considerations of scale need to be part of that conversation.
Change is in the air
We put too much faith into what we *think* customers want. Even when we know what they want, we have a hard time delivering it. I call it procrastination through research. In my experience, we will never know enough about something that has not been done before until we do it ourselves.
Who decides when it’s time to do it? You’d need to do a small test on your own. In many companies it happens as long as it doesn’t cost much, as long as doing the right thing for the company does not take away time from your day job of following the rules.
Do it anyway. Find the time. When the critics raise their objections, work to find a way to help them tell you specifics. In some cases you may successfully ask them to work with you to make it happen. It helps if you build a personal network inside the organization. Seek out the doers, they exist.
Passion is infectious
But passion is dangerous as well. Customers love passion, they feel it - and sometimes will look to take advantage of it, why not? Internally, it’s not a matter of jealousy as much as facing your own insecurities - when you display passion the emotion that comes with it that may hold you back.
You may become vulnerable to setbacks, make it very personal. Work may be personal, but your goals are larger than self fulfillment. Focus on that. You see opportunity for the business in the new marketplace and want very much to help your company and team succeed.
And right here, as I’m thinking about leading change and helping your customers see your business in a new light - remembering that you need to have something they want in the first place - I wonder out loud: how many tribes can you possibly lead?
Internal/external dance
All of those who are leading the conversation on social media inside organizations experience it. The marketers who are looking to try new things that are a bit outside the status quo - or challenge it in some way - know about it.
Sometimes you need to be an advocate for your customer community, sometimes an ambassador on behalf of your company’s business - always a facilitator. This is my experience - conversation is a dance.
I’m intrigued by this concept of tribes that Seth Godin put forth in his latest book and wonder about applications and implications for the marketer who faces the three imperatives today.
How many tribes should you lead? How many tribes do you lead?
|
Comments
Thanks for sharing the article...
It is really a good one...
Posted by: martha | 12.02.08
This is best virtual assistant service which keeps you in collaborative relationships with best amazing offers virtual assistant
Posted by: ABBEY | 12.02.08
@Martha - I would believe you if you were to elaborate. What made it a good article?
@Abbey - seriously?
Posted by: Valeria Maltoni | 12.02.08
I'm concerned your title might be off. If I understand Seth's perspective, tribal leaders make a choice between wanting to lead or choosing to lead. The title of your post implies the first, when the correct answer is the second. No?
Posted by: Ari Herzog | 12.02.08
In fact the answer is none for should ;-) It's about wanting to and doing, correct. Good for you, Ari. I tend to be too subtle, a trait I carry with me from Europe.
Posted by: Valeria Maltoni | 12.02.08
This is a good thread. Sometimes we get bogged down in over-thinking/over-researching/over-networking and forget to set goals and focus on achieving them. Whether working for ourselves or with others, we must lead to succeed. Otherwise we are just spinning our wheels -- that doesn't pay bills!
As for @abbey, I have my doubts. She seems to post the same thing everywhere and her grammer is not the best. Just a personal observation from someone who makes a living as a Virtual Assistant.
Posted by: Karalyn | 12.04.08
I once had a mentor tell me that I was a good manager, but not a good leader. He said that good managers know how to tell people what to do, and lead by authority. Great leaders know how to inspire people to action - leading by influence...
I embrace the idea that there are tribes and leaders. I feel less comfortable embracing the idea that I may be a tribe leader, which might be the reason I MIGHT not be one.
Rather than getting wrapped up in the concept, I think it's important to ask ourselves if we as individuals and as employees are being true to our talent, potential and calling. Are we acting on our passion, are we doing something with our ideas and do we understand our great ability to influence to create something better, something great and remarkable.
You'v raised some good points, Valeria. Thanks. I would guess that if we're operating within that potential I mentioned above, there might be no limit to the tribes that follow... just thinking out loud.
Posted by: leigh duncan-durst | 12.05.08
@Karalyn - it must be frustrating to see someone market in such a careless way services that on the surface may be similar to those you offer. There is also only so much we can make people do, including ourselves, if we don't want to do it.
@Leigh - remember that mentors are also people. And that we change. The best definition of manager I have found is by Marcus Buckingham. He wrote: managers get people done through work. That is very different than the authority concept. We give leaders permission to lead us. Maybe because they connect with what we believe to be true. I like where you're taking the thought - human potential. The first person we lead is our own self. Thank you for sharing your thinking with us.
Posted by: Valeria Maltoni | 12.05.08