|
White socks are great. They go with everything, wear forever, and are excellent value for the price. And for those who love this argument, you can't measure ROI.
On the downside, white socks are vanilla to the bosses and not always welcome in the Board Room. Furthermore, they represent discretionary spending and if ROI can't be measured, why would I want them in my dresser drawers?
And there you have it--the classic argument. You can't live with them, but you don't want to live without them. Marketing is a lot like white socks. It shouldn't be.
While marketing goes with everything a business creates and never wears out, have we convinced those who matter most--CEOs, CFOs and our clients that marketing is an excellent value for the price? In these times of economic downturn, we must do a better job of marketing marketing. But how?
Let's begin by ending the argument regarding ROI. When we say we can't measure it, we sound like whiners. Our bosses don't want to hear it and we will never convince them that marketing efforts can't be measured in terms of a return on investment as measured in dollars. Besides, we're making the wrong argument. The issue isn't about social media, social networking, direct marketing, public relations or advertising. Those are tools, and we don't measure ROI against the success of a tool.
Instead, we present ROI based on the success of quarterly and annual results, using a variety of tools measured against the objective and the goals. In other words, if we are charged with launching a product, we will use a variety of tools. The objective might be something about getting the right people to notice the new product and to get that product in the right places. But one of the goals must measure sales. And by working with sales and customer service and retail in this example, the marketing effort can take credit for creating most of the initial sales of the product. The smart marketer, working closely with the other departments, will create a formula that represents each functional area's cost as compared to revenues. Voila! ROI. Is it correct to the penny? No. But ROI almost never is and our bosses won't care as long as we speak with one voice.
Furthermore, we should develop case studies for every campaign, project and objective in which marketing plays a role. Some of it will be anecdotal; much of it needs to be fact based. And that means putting realistic metrics in place. As we produce those case studies, we get them into the hands of everyone who matters. I bet that soon marketing will not be seen as discretionary spending.
Finally, when we are called upon to share marketing success, stop talking in acronyms, jargon and generalities. When we do so, the others around the table hear blah, blah, blah. Be specific. What did we do and how did it work? The what is a few sentences about the audiences we reached, not the tools we used, and the how is ROI in sales revenue or growth as a percentage of total customers.
One more thing: Since many of us are consultants and our first job is to grow our own business, when we reach out to potential clients the board room suggestion is relevant here as well: Share why clients hire us by using specific examples focused on the what we did and the how it worked.
Obviously, this is top line stuff here and not meant to detail a plan. But as advice, it works. I've seen it and I've personally experienced it. Forget discussing tools; those in charge don't care how we do what we do. Discuss results. That's what they care about. Oh, and as for the white socks--only wear them around the house or at sporting events and accept the fact that they don't impress.
|
Comments
Beautifully said Lewis. And you are exactly right. For to long, marketers have resisted the inevitability of ROI, because it makes them nervous to think their work will be held to a standard of success against a predetermined set of objectives. BUT, marketing that fails to drive cash flow through the organization is wasted. No longer can we argue that we get so many "soft" benefits that prevent a good measure of ROI.
Posted by: Frank Martin | 11.17.08
Frank,
We agree. Yes, there are intangible benefits. However, CEOs and CFOs don't really care that much about them. They need to show the Board real results--their jobs, and ours, are on the line for the top and bottom lines.
Posted by: Lewis Green | 11.17.08
Hi Lewis, I find that one can gain credibility in eyes of senior management if a marketer works on the ROI model in conjunction with finance.
The output of a ROI model is much easier for a SVP/EVP to bless when the model itself been jointly developed with Marketing and Finance personnel.
Posted by: Paul Barsch | 11.17.08
Paul,
Great point! When I was at Starbucks, Finance was willing to work with every functional area. As a consultant, I make every effort to have my client's Finance or Accounting departments involved in establishing goals and measuring results.
Posted by: Lewis Green | 11.17.08
Excellent post, Lewis. As a consultant and package designer, my job is to show clients successful results from past projects. It's also crucial to give them an overview and achievable goals based on our research--and not fall into the trap of explaining the nuts and bolts of every phase of our work. As you said, management doesn't want or need to know what tools we use. They do need to know that we have the expertise, insights and abilities to help them achieve their goals, ie, deliver results; that we have a history of doing just that for other clients that they can trust. That adds even more to ROI in my view--that great intangible known as value.
Posted by: Ted Mininni | 11.17.08
Good post, as always, Lewis. With the downturn in the economy, marketers who do not work to quantify results will have more to fear: the mighty budget axe. While it is fair to say that most company functions will see some budget cuts, the marketing function may get more than its share unless they are willing to set up some metrics. Significant marketing budget cuts, in turn, will have a detrimental effect on the company, so marketers need to pony up to their responsibility--and accountability--for everybody's sake.
Posted by: Claire Ratushny | 11.17.08
Ted and Claire,
Great additions to the conversation. Thank you for your POVs. To repeat:
They do need to know that we have the expertise, insights and abilities to help them achieve their goals, ie, deliver results; that we have a history of doing just that for other clients that they can trust.--Ted
With the downturn in the economy, marketers who do not work to quantify results will have more to fear: the mighty budget axe.--Claire
Good stuff!
Posted by: Lewis Green | 11.17.08
I agree, Lewis, that we don't need to go through all the details for clients of what we do to get to the desired results. But sometimes clients want to know - in general terms - what the process is and how it works. I wouldn't offer the information, but I'd be prepared to explain it if asked.
Posted by: David Reich | 11.17.08
Lew -- Just so I don't worry about you, I just want to be sure you're clear: White socks do NOT go with everything... you know that, right?
; )
Posted by: Ann Handley | 11.17.08
David,
I agree. We have to answer all client's questions. Thanks for adding that.
Ann,
They don't? Oh, oh. I'm in white sox as I type this and am feeling kind of trashy wondering what kind of person am I.
Posted by: Lewis Green | 11.18.08
Good construct to think about this stuff, Lewis. I am wearing white socks with my suit to my next budget review.
That'll show 'em!
Seriously, avoiding the "by-the-tool" ROI analysis is a sound practice.
Of course, it helps if your metrics are looking better Q/Q - otherwise the Ax could come down on anything new you've added. Seen it before.
Patrick
Posted by: Patrick Moran - White-sock wearin' CMO, Mzinga | 11.18.08
I do like the implicit idea here of team work between different departments and functions. We are all on the same side working toward the same goals.
Posted by: Neil Anuskiewicz | 11.18.08
Well firstly on the fashion front white socks really don't go with everything, in fact they should only ever be worn as part of your sports kit.
But on a serious note, yes what you say makes perfect sense and impportantly as a marketer I fully believe the function of marketing should always be there to generate income for the business.
So for example any consultant should be confident that the advice and support they offer will far exceed the invoice they present to their clients.
It is that simple, and the good consultants know only too well not to try and hide behind a wall of jargon to justify their fee.
Posted by: John Jackson | 11.20.08
Patrick, Neil and John:
Thank you for helping me with my white socks fashion statement. Just a note: I have on white socks again today.
More important, your sage advice regarding revenues, cross-functional efforts and delivering ROI to clients are spot on.
Posted by: Lewis Green | 11.20.08
Maverick Marketing© … Trailride into the Wild West of New Marketing, by Tom Hayes, offers Chief Executive Officers, Chief Marketing Officers, marketing personnel, and business students new insights into the dynamic and “maverick” marketing culture that drives many innovations companies. Maverick Marketing© provides numerous case studies and real life examples of “maverick” strategies and tactics. Heartily endorsed by senior executives from Allied Capital, Galderma, L'Oréal, Unilever and others, this book has the essential role of marketing in the platforming and execution of a Brand’s vision. Hayes’s Maverick Marketing© begins with the premise that larger marketers in today’s Wild West of New Marketing can no longer leave “maverick” activities to the smaller, scrappy companies due to the rapidly changing business environment. Maverick Marketing© is a “must read” for every marketer and a “must have” reference book.
Posted by: SL | 11.21.08