|
In business, a consistent experience is often the key to establishing comfort among your consumers. While I’m not suggesting that you shouldn’t surprise them by going above and beyond their expectations, it’s important to get the basics right first and deliver on your promises.
Here’s a recent example of a situation that didn’t add up. I recently visited Toronto for a family event. And, while standing at the check-in counter of our hotel, I listened to a woman explain her problem to the attendant at the desk. Seems the representative she spoke to when she called the hotel’s reservation line had told her something about this particular location that wasn’t true.
So here she stood pleading her case to the person on site – and that person was stuck in the unenviable position of having to explain that what she was told wasn’t true. Of course, she explained, the only reason she had booked at this particular hotel was because of the promise that had been made to her. While the attendant was very apologetic, it hardly solved the problem.
So why did this stand out so much to me? Because I was waiting at the desk to clear up a similar issue. We were told something through the reservation line that wasn’t true at this location either.
It’s a classic case of the left hand not knowing what the right hand is doing. And here’s why this is so troublesome.
1. You’re creating an expectation that can’t be met, leading to frustration, wasted time and a negative experience.
2. You’re giving the consumer reason to doubt anything you say in the future. After all, why should they ever trust the reservation line again?
3. Worst of all, you’re giving your customer a reason to go to the competition.
And, within your organization, you’re making things very hard for the people on the front lines who have to clean up the mess.
The lesson? On a smaller scale, make sure not to arm one team with generic answers to questions that will give people a reason to doubt the overall experience (or make another team look bad or worse, stupid.) On a bigger scale, if you’re going to departmentalize any aspect of your business, make sure all the departments are in sync, so you’re all set to offer a consistent experience. Rightfully so, that's what people expect.
What about you, have you ever experienced a case where one hand didn't know what the other was doing?
|
Comments
Mark, I enjoyed this post and story because it's a perfect example of departments/silos having their own processes and data sources and not communicating. If everyone was looking at the same set of data, chances are they wouldn't be giving erroneous information to customers. Of course, there are other issues such as training and hiring that come to bear in creating a consistent customer experience.
Break down the silos, get everyone in the company (across different channels) on the same page with a shared repository for customer data. It's harder than it sounds, but a very worthwhile endeavor.
Posted by: Paul Barsch | 06.10.08
Paul: Here's the part that really gets me though. When you call the hotel directly to ask them a question, as I did to confirm my reservation, I was transferred back to the reservation line. So instead of speaking to someone who would have a direct hand in influencing my stay, I had to speak to someone else a country away.
As a customer, it just feels weird to be rerouted like that. And then, when there's an inconsistency between what your told and what's real, it just compounds the flaw in the process even more so.
End result: frustration.
Posted by: Mark Goren | 06.10.08
Great post!
I am sure many of you have already heard of it but there is a great book that covers, as part of its topic, the consistency of customer experience through systems:
The E-Myth Revisited: Why Most Small Businesses Don't Work and What to Do About It
http://www.amazon.com/E-Myth-Revisited-Small-Businesses-About/dp/0887307280/ref=pd_bbs_sr_1?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1213139162&sr=8-1
The book seems to focus on small business but I think the ideas are applicable to companies and organizations of all sizes.
Posted by: Neil Anuskiewicz | 06.10.08
As a former Torontonian, I won't provide any editorial. However, I'm curious to know whether the hotel front desk staff comped you in any way for the negative experience. Since you weren't the only one in that position, it wasn't made up, and the hotel should have compensated you with something. Then it would be up to the GM to tackle the overarching issue with head office.
Posted by: Elaine Fogel | 06.10.08
Yes, Elaine, that's exactly what happened. Our issue had to do with price. The reservation line told us that the hotel accepted a discount card that actually wasn't accepted. We were billed the full amount and the GM at the hotel honoured what we had been told on the phone after we talked it through.
In our situation, he had to take our word for it. For all he knew, we could have been making up a story (we weren't!). In the case of the other woman, there was no way she was making up her story. She had specifically asked for a suite with an adjoining room that had two queen beds and was told that it would be no problem. However, the suites at this hotel only connected to rooms with king beds. And she had booked there based on being able to have the extra room with two beds.
Much different situation, and I'm not sure how the hotel handled it.
Posted by: Mark Goren | 06.11.08
I had a non-smoking hotel comp me a night because the person in the room next door (breaking the rules) smoked in their room. The noxious smell seeped into my room and this was a very old, all wooden hotel. Needless to say I was annoyed enough to call down stairs.
They came up immediately and knocked on the neighbor's door.
The next morning the desk staff looked at the "log" and was all apologies and I was comped a night. They something like this is a non-smoking hotel and you did not get what you paid for so you get a free night.
That was impressive. I must write a thank you note to the smoker in the next room some time.
Posted by: Neil Anuskiewicz | 06.11.08
Mark,
I like to call this "one hand not knowing what the other is doing" the BELL syndrome. There is no more infuriating experience then trying to get a straight , consistent answer out of those silos. By far the worst.
Posted by: Jamie | 06.11.08
Neil: Thanks for the link and the story. I read the first page of the book (on Amazon) and my reaction was, "I believe that!"
Jamie: Could be Bell. Or Fido. Or Videotron. Or Marriott. The list goes on!
Posted by: Mark Goren | 06.11.08
I had a similar sitch to Mark in terms of being routed to someone who wasn't on the site. I lost my bag so tried to call the local grocery chainstore where I thought I might have left it.
I got through to a call centre, who then called the store "on my behalf" - which is what I has set out to do myself! WHY WHY WHY!!!!???
This felt like the left hand being so under the thumb of the right hand that it was not able to act on its own. V frustrating!
Posted by: Andrew Fielding | 06.16.08
Great post. I think the most important thing in any business is communication.
But if front line staff have problems because customers have been given the wrong information, is there an easy way that they can get that information changed? Or do they just get on with it? The right internal communication processes need to be developed and put in place.
I also have an example. While having my car brakes replaced at an independent garage, they said the headlights were faulty and gave me a quote. No problem, the price was OK and it would save me a job (replacement is very difficult). When I went to pick up the car hours later, the mechanic said they couldn't change the lights in my Renault - it would only be done by a main dealer! The service co-ordinator didn't know and the head office computer system didn't tell him either - the mechanic knew and was only 8 feet away!! Decent service quickly turned sour. It was more of a case that the finger didn't know what the thumb was doing!
Posted by: Nigel Dean | 06.17.08