|
Is microblogging the latest fad or the next big thing? Microblogging is just like regular blogging, except it’s limited to 140 characters. The leader in the space is Twitter .
According to a recent blog post by Peter Kim, Twitter is now used regularly by 6% of American online adults. That sounds about right to me, although Twitter power user Robert Scoble thinks the figure is “way too high.” But if you want to reach an affluent, well-educated, early adopter audience, there might not be a better communication channel out there.
To get a better sense of this emerging social media tool, we assembled a micro-panel to discuss it: Jeremiah Owyang, a senior analyst on Social Computing at Forrester Research and a fan of Twitter, and David Berkowitz, director of Emerging Media at 360i, who is skeptical about Twitter's application to business. We hope you enjoy the lively debate!
Link to Original Audio Source
Listen learn and weigh in – Let us know which side you are on by leaving a comment on this blog post. Or, feel free to comment on a topic you would like us to explore further.
Coming up will be another "Prof-cast," “Pay per Click: Boom or Bust??” It features Alan Rimm-Kaufman, who leads the Rimm-Kaufman Group and is a fan of Pay per Click, and Steve Rubel, senior vice president at Edelman, who is skeptical about the future of Pay per Click.
So don’t miss it …
|
Comments
It would be great if your podcasts were on iTunes - nice low overhead way to keep up. (If they are, they're hard to find, a search for "marketprofs" produces one German-language program!)
Posted by: John Whiteside | 10.24.07
Paul, nice podcast. Thank you for putting that together.
I listened carefully to the points being made about Twitter as a business tool for marketers. I did not hear a compelling case for marketers to use Twitter AT ALL.
I have to concur. We do not advise our clients to use it and don’t foresee advising them anytime soon.
Having said that, I can tell you The Top 10 Reasons Why Twitter Scares Me: http://www.achievemarketleadership.com/?p=74
Posted by: Glenn Gow | 10.24.07
I think as a marketer and a communicator its not smart to discount any form of communication, especially one that people are using. 6%, way more than I would have imagined.
For someone to say marketers shouldn't use it at all is a little extreme. Every form of communication has its place. Just like you wouldn't use a TV ad for every client and campaign, you wouldn't use Twitter for every client and campaign.
You could do some really neat stuff with Twitter if you have an imagination. It'd be a great tool if you wanted to do an interactive promotion in real time. Shark Week did this great interactive game, people could sign up to receive text messages and would have to respond in a timely manner. That's a sucky explanation. But the point is, Twitter could be a good tool for something like this.
It's free for the company, it's free for the users, and it's easy for users to sign up. If it's appropriate for the brand and appropriate for the campaign, then why wouldn't you use it?
Posted by: Tanya | 10.25.07
I have to admit it: I believe that Twitter is just a fad. And I'd like to see who these 6% of adult are. I've been on Twitter, got friends, followed some conversation, but still have the feeling that it's a replacement for the old messenger (ok, with some nice features) or for a phone call. But what's next?
Posted by: gianandrea | 10.25.07
6% seems very high to me, a regular user, maybe that's how many people joined? I think there are lurkers. As far as marketing, I agree with Tanya it depends on the brand. You can always delete your Twit and primarily it's an immediate call to action that disapears from your front page within an hour.
Posted by: angela | 10.25.07
John
I will work with Mprofs to get the podcasts up on itunes
great suggestion
pd
Posted by: Paul Dunay | 10.25.07
I think twitter is a complete waste of time. I don't believe that the 6% is an accurate number either. I think it is a fad, and won't last any longer 30 months.
Posted by: direct response marketing | 10.25.07
I agree with Tanya about marketers using any viable means of communication avaliable to them, however, I peronally think Twitter is definitely a fad and I find it useless. I have spent a little bit of time messing around with Twitter to analyze any potential but I just don't see any advantage to using it.
In my humble opinion, "Twitter is for Twits".
Posted by: Dave | 10.25.07
I had a hard time with Twitter at first. Then I used it during the PRSA International Conference in Philadelphia this week. I posted a blog entry about how the experience really changed my mind. It's a VERY useful tool, I call it CB Radio for the Internet. See http://urltea.com/1vg3
Posted by: Steven Lubetkin | 10.25.07
Steven -- I was the same way (skeptical) but changed my mind after spending time with it. Love the "CB" analogy...!
Dave, G, direct response and the rest of you still-skeptics...I saw a comment today that said, "Twitter should be called Shitter!" Just thought you might like that....lol.
Posted by: Ann Handley | 10.25.07
Here's a good video about twitter. Check it out - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eBGIQ7ZuuiU
Posted by: John Rickoll | 10.26.07
Wow, Ann. Shitter is very creative! Anyway, probably is too strong as a definition for the state-of-the-art messenger.
Posted by: gianandrea | 10.29.07
Gianandrea -- Definitely. I'm a fan of Twitter, but I thought the moniker was worth a laugh, nonetheless.
Posted by: Ann Handley | 10.29.07
Twitter is a collaborative messaging environment; it's not a marketing platform. The primary reason is that it's not broadcasting. No one will see your Twitters unless they subscribe to them (unlikely to subscribe to commercial twitter feed).
The 6% figure has basically been shown to be inaccurate.
For more details, look at:
http://www.researchrecap.com/index.php/2007/10/29/blogosphere-all-a-twitter-over-forrester-estimates/
Posted by: Barry Graubart | 10.30.07
Why do you assume that Moms live in ignorance of technology tools? For your example, better to use white collar criminals recently released from federal prison, than to pick on women old enough to be someone's Mom.
Posted by: Ruth V. Armstrong | 11.01.07