|
When last week I uploaded a presentation endorsing the importance social media, David Armano pointed out - tongue in cheek - that someone had forgotten to send me the memo that Web 2.0 was going down the drain. With this post on Daily Fix, I'd like to broaden the debate and get your views on my position that I did get the memo, yet ignored it for missing the point.
Unless you're a Silicon Valley VC or entrepreneur, the speed at which Web 2.0 is or isn't happening is irrelevant. What is important, is that social, search and other technologies have already reached sufficient critical mass to make the elusive commodity we call word-of-mouth (WOM) "visible," "indelible," and "measurable." And to top it all "impossible to control."
For traditional marketers this is worse than a nightmare. In the old days, you could still control a conversation by throwing enough money at it or outsmarting the media. I remember tactically forgetting to appear on the evening news in the middle of a PR crisis. Then, 24 hours later the media had moved on, and so did the water-cooler conversations.
Faced with the same crisis on the Web today, I'd need to blog, write and influence my heart out to contain the message. And even if I was especially fast, truthful and professional about it, I would probably fail because Google footprints cannot be erased.
So, from a marketing communication perspective, we have moved past the question whether Web 2.0 is or isn't happening. Even if no additional consumer would embrace the new technologies that are coming our way, it is impossible to deny the influence of online conversations on the perception of and preference for brands.
That is why - in my opinion - anyone involved in sales or marketing has no other option but to accept the social media reality and manage every contact as if they were the editor-in-chief of the WSJ himself.
On the how-to's there's a bunch of Web 2.0 and buzz-management gurus that can help (hey, someone even called me). But I guess there's also a much more effective, be it somewhat old-fashioned method, which has been proven to work.
As brands are defined by the conversations and communities that support them, you could try and delight these customer communities to the point they only want to say good things about you.
But then again, perhaps it's the delighting that is the real issue ...
What do you say, am I crazy ?
|
Comments
Alain,
You're not crazy, at least based on this post. You may be crazy but who can really say except those closest to you.
I argue that Web 2.0 hasn't changed anything for us marketers except added some new and useful tools.
Brands are built by creating great experiences and meeting audience's wants, needs and desires. That's always been true. And Web 2.0 doesn't change that. And if businesses do brand building badly, all the Web 2.0 in the world won't help.
It's the message and the experience that matters, not the medium, as long as that medium reaches the right audience at the right time, and that, too, has always been true about marketing.
Posted by: Lewis Green | 04.25.07
Great post, Alain.
I think it's important to point out that we're talking about word of mouth MARKETING...not just word of mouth.
You're right, joining the conversation is becoming non-optional. And we've seen how powerful it can be when companies do join in. But it's not only delighting. It's engaging the dissenters. You don't have to try and turn them into evangelists or even fans, but you do need to acknowledge them and let them know that they have been heard. That's what most of them want anyway.
Posted by: Spike Jones | 04.25.07
Alain,
What I liked about your presentation was that it integrated certain truths how the "2.0" movement is influencing bahavior (even if it's on a smaller scale than widely reported)
We've always known it's about us—about people. Now a good experience can include things such as feeling like "you've been heard" or feeling like you are part of the brand.
I thought these ideas came across in your deck.
Posted by: David Armano | 04.25.07
I like what Spike has to say.
His line of thinking came across last night in my first reading of "Creating Customer Evangelists". Engaging with all commentators is important nowadays, because of the impression left on casual observers (80-90% of viewers) that so-and-so company is interacting and/or cares. In the words of Ali G: "Respect".
Posted by: Mario Vellandi | 04.25.07
Thanks for the kind words, Mario. We're big fans of Ben and Jackie over here at Brains on Fire! That's a great book. I hope you enjoyed it.
Posted by: Spike | 04.25.07
"Brands are built by creating great experiences and meeting audience's wants, needs and desires. That's always been true. And Web 2.0 doesn't change that. And if businesses do brand building badly, all the Web 2.0 in the world won't help."
Hi Lewis,
Agreed. I just think that 2.0 helps make it easier for customers to talk about these things & makes it easier to connect to a brand/company.
Posted by: Damon Billian | 04.25.07
Alain and all: if social media isn't optional, why are so few companies actually doing it? And of those few who do, why are so many so bad at it?
I think high involvement brands have a need for deeper conversations; impulse driven brands (many in CPG, perhaps) come off as a bit odd when trying to deeply engage when we consumers simply don't care. My favorite gum company doesn't need to talk to me.
I haven't done my homework on this, so forgive my ignorance -- is blogging still growing at the same rate it was six months ago? If it is, I wonder if it's corporate or personal.
Posted by: Stephen Denny | 04.25.07
Stephen - The rate is not the same (that was bound to change), but as of the last Technorati report (put out last month), there are 130,000 new blogs being created every day.
IIRC, 3,000 - 5,000 of them are splogs.
Posted by: Cam Beck | 04.26.07
Cam: yep, I just looked it up, as well on Sifry's blog. While he says the rate has dropped to 'doubling every 320 days', I'd still say this is a healthy clip, wouldn't you?
Questions from my side would be:
. If Japanese has become language #1 on blogs, is the growth being driven by Japanese individuals who are doing today what the US was doing six months to a year ago?
. Is there a shift from 'personal' to 'corporate'... and is there any way to actually tell?
No need to answer any of this, but I'm curious...
Posted by: Stephen Denny | 04.26.07
Hi Alain,
You're not crazy at all. What still amazes me is how, at this point, one can still be in denial mode.
Web 2.0 is a reality because many businesses are already demonstrating revenue can flow their way with it and they get stock market value out of it.
More importantly to us, marketers, empowered consumers and customers changed the way we are doing our job forever.
Social media, user generated content, and WOM are clearly impacting B2C and B2B businesses. How can this be denied? I'm still puzzled.
I'm sure we are expanding the "believers" gang rapidly. Keep pushing it as we all do.
Posted by: Emmanuel Obadia | 04.28.07
Nope, you aren't crazy at all. I will admit that I am a little off the back of the pack when it comes to Web 2.0, but I am learning a lot, real fast.
In the past,the only way consumers could get someone to listen to their problems and complaints about a product they purchased was to be successful at weeding through the neverending maze of "Press 2 if you purchased this" and "Press 1 if you purchased that". Now, consumers are conditioned to being able to have a ready and willing Internet audience with just a few keystrokes.
As many companies have found out, social media can make you or break you. It's the devil we know. However, I'm learning that Web 2.0 is a lot like the lottery...you can't win if you don't play.
Posted by: Jill Hamilton | 04.28.07
Hi Alain,
It's a great post! The fact remains that at the end of the day, web2.0 is here and hads empowered customer/prospects in a big way!
Creating a positive WOM is definitely a step in that area and for companies which have product offering, this is indeed most important!
And what happens when one needs to create a concept (Business) for B2B.. something like - People Ready Business from Microsoft, Human Network from Cisco and Search for Better Search from Hakia. Its interesting to see the approach to involve bloggers to create buzz.
Posted by: Pallavi Bhardwaj | 05.04.07