Opinion, Analysis and News from MarketingProfs Opinion. Commentary. News.
BLOG HOME RSS/XMLBOOK CLUBMARKETING PROFS
   
 
Andrea Learned Andrea Learned   Bio
02.23.07

WSJ: Using a Customer's Journey to Tell a Compelling Story

stumbleupon digg del.icio.us

Have you noticed the new Wall Street Journal ad campaign yet? "Every journey needs a Journal" uses celebrities from the spectrum of industries (Sheryl Crow and Jake Burton, to Alice Waters and Oscar De La Hoya), who are telling their histories -- with the relevant WSJ news tied in along the timeline.

So, for example, Sheryl Crow's journey highlights her music career as well as her breast cancer diagnosis/treatment. The print ad shows a large b/w image of her looking past the camera (to her next stop on her journey?) with a line drawing/handwritten style timeline that includes a WSJ clipping of a breast cancer risk article. Then, the companion site includes a bio of each celebrity and a short, well-done video interview/documentary type piece (See the Oscar De La Hoya one embedded below. Sheryl Crow's video is not yet up.)

Now, certainly the Wall Street Journal has the advantage in that its whole reason for being is this sort of in-depth content, but there are still elements of this "Journeys" campaign that any brand could put into play. A few things worth noting:

1) They used celebrities (a few of whom may still fly a bit under the radar for the general public) but focused both on the thing that made them famous AND their life as a regular person. Sheryl Crow is famous for her music, but she is a normal person in her fight with breast cancer. Celebrities or not, this type of mini-profile gives prospective subscribers and ad campaign viewers a lot of possibilities for finding common ground with their fellow readers.

2) The design of the campaign is spare and simple, but compelling. Large images of the celebrity in question, hand-drawn and written timelines, and lots of white space so the viewer can absorb the message in the tale -- and possibly be inspired to head online. When a print ad viewer then goes online, the design look/feel of the site is consistent with the magazine ad they just saw - an obvious, but still brilliant move in this day and age.

3) The WSJ seems to understand that in order to broaden their audience, they have to get away from the stuffy old-boy newspaper reputation that they might have. This campaign, with its real people/real stories, makes the paper seem that much more accessible to a wider range of readers. There may be a lot of people in the world who have kept the WSJ in the money/markets/business box up until now, with no idea how much more "human interest" and cultural perspective the paper covers as well. This campaign helps to subtly change that view.

(They also made sure that the videos would be easy for low-tech people like me to figure out how to embed. For more on the development/shooting/sharing of the videos, here's a great blog post.)

Now, I admit, I'm on a marketing-through-storytelling kick, so I'm hyper-aware of good examples these days. But, I have found it fascinating to observe as brands have started to mine their existing content, customer base, blogs, YouTube and employee files for new and interesting angles on their work, products or services.

Where does your brand intersect with the journeys of its customers?



Read more on this subject:



TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.mpdailyfix.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-tb.cgi/6906

Comments

andrea, thanks for submitting this ad campaign. i have always considered the wsj just for guys with pinstripes suits. this human touch goes well together with the human touch highlighted in tim's post, too.

Posted by: gianandrea | 02.26.07

I completely agree, Gianandrea. This campaign is a winner, because it breathes life into what some might consider a stodgy product, making it relevant to readers while at the same communicating breadth and depth. All that... and the use of video is really well-done.

In an age where newspapers are struggling for readership, it's great to see some evolving.

Posted by: Ann Handley | 02.26.07

Yes - let's emphasize the point that their video is really well done. Not overproduced, sort of documentary/behind-the-scenes, so what the celebrities/business figures are saying seems a lot more true to life. I know good video production is expensive, but if you invest in it (do fewer videos, but higher quality?) you'll get people like us, for one, talking and noticing your brand a bit more.

Posted by: Andrea Learned | 02.26.07

The WSJ has been running this same campaign, on and off, since the 1980s. This version does a nice job of brining it up to date. Steve.

Posted by: Steve McNamara | 03.01.07

I have been wondering how successful have they been in the past, and are they more successful with this campaign?

I my view, and I have been wrong before, this will not take them far. That is sad for such a good newspaper. Not only does WSJ have to get over the image that it is for Wall Streeters only, but also that is "of the neocons, by the neocons, for the neocons". They have to get rid of this image.

Posted by: Sri Seshadri | 03.03.07

Post a comment

Most Active Posts

Login to Daily Fix  |  Contact the Editor  |  RSS/XML  |  Advertising

 

Copyright 2008 © Marketing Profs, LLC   |  User Agreement  |  Privacy  |  XML Site Map