Opinion, Analysis and News from MarketingProfs Opinion. Commentary. News.
BLOG HOME RSS/XMLBOOK CLUBMARKETING PROFS
   
 
Stephen Denny Stephen Denny   Bio
02.27.07

Rebranding at the DNA Level

stumbleupon digg del.icio.us

Dear CMO: It seems a bit stereotypical for the new CMO to make his or her presence felt by quickly strangling the mascot, changing the tagline and firing the old ad agency. I see over at Spike’s place that Bank of America has just shed its tag line because, we’re to understand, it has become too ingrained in the company’s culture.

He goes on to say in an earlier post that JC Penney is refreshing itself with, “Every Day Matters,” which they forlornly hope will be as powerful as “Just Do It”. The AFLAC duck apparently just missed going the way of Taco Bell’s Chihuahua -- early reports of its demise from the new CMO were apparently incorrect.

Here’s an exhortation to the marketing community. I hope you’ll join me. A new CMO’s role is more fundamental than changing the brand’s wrapping. The role of the CMO is to lead the process of discovery that quantifies the health and relevance of the brand and then spearhead the implementation with clear direction forward if the brand is healthy and a fact-based recovery plan if it isn’t.

Rebranding may be a necessary step if your company is heading over the proverbial waterfall; it can also be an opportunity to create a cohesive brand strategy that makes the whole of your product portfolio greater than the sum of its parts. Either way, this is an organic process that begins at the branding microbe level.

The process itself is a bit lengthy for a quick post (more detail on what experiences I’ve gained here at Note to CMO and here on Squidoo), but the essential elements break down into four major categories.


Customers:

Any brand audit begins with a deep understanding of the types, segments, growth rates and usage patterns of those people who buy and use your stuff. Seek out and observe the actions and words of your users. This means considerable work on meaningful segmentation, growth rates, cluster analyses, and other quantitative disciplines; it also means enthnography, netnography, and in-depth one-on-one interviews of the most highly qualitative type. Let your end users grade you versus your own expectations, self-image, and your competition.


Company:

What does everyone inside the walls think the brand means? What does management think? What does the rank and file think? Do you think you’re innovative? Best in class? Sexy? Do you have a good grip on your own core strategic competencies? Do you know your strategic capacity blind spots, where you don’t feel the team can deliver the goods? And do you know who you aspire to be and how you want to be seen by your customers and partners?


Channels:

Don’t just think distribution partners here – include key influencers in your market. How does your largest distributor rank you on the scorecard? Your largest OEM customer? What does the leading columnist or trade opinion leader think about you versus Brand X? What about the feet on the street – have you won hearts and minds at the point of influence?


Competition:

Understand your competition the same way you understand your customers – their size, shape and growth rates, plus who their customers are and what those customers think about you. Grade them on a scorecard with as much objectivity as you can muster. Do as much deep competitive intelligence gathering as you’re comfortable with, but select your agency carefully: hiring the wrong agency will get you in hot water.


* * *
Key Takeaways:

> The more thorough a job you do with objective, meaningful data collection, the more deep insights you’ll come up with. So don’t cut corners. Consciously be as objective as you can, see the everyday with new eyes, draw your conclusions based on the facts and first person feedback you receive.

> Whenever possible, collect first-person intelligence. Interview end users. Talk to influencers. Make sure the voice of the market is coming through. You want facts, not feelings here.

> Review your competition with as much dispassion as you possibly can. Look at the world and the market through their eyes and listen to their words and don’t mistake their low priorities for weaknesses.

> Look for the gaps. Does our self-image match up to what our key channel partners think about us? Do our customers really know what we stand for, or are we lost in the ambient noise of their everyday lives? Does competition see us as a threat? Look for the gaps.


* * *


You now have a room full of data. You will also know more about the reality of your current brand image than anyone else. Now begin to connect the dots. Look for gaps. You will have a long list of things you need to do, which will have fallen out of your interviews. You’ll hear things like, “You people don’t understand how we do business… you don’t give us enough time for new products…” which means you need to fix your product launch process and your communication protocols with key clients. You'll know these when you come across them.

As important as these hot lists of things to address will be, the more important outputs of the process are the insights into how your world sees your brand. You will quickly see if your market – customers, channels, competitors – believes you have a relevant, strong, consistent brand. Or not. You’ll notice your own rose colored glasses if you find that loyalty ends at the reception desk.

And between the self-assessment, the market feedback, and your desired state of being, you’ll discover your migration path -- the way to get from here to where you want to go. This is where your work begins, turning insights into concrete implementation plans and milestones, reporting progress and successes along the way to both internal and external stakeholders.

As Seneca says, “Say What You Will Be, Then Do What Must Be Done.” You set out to understand your brand health and you now know where you stand. Now it’s time to do what must be done.


Good luck!



Read more on this subject:



TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.mpdailyfix.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-tb.cgi/6964

Comments

Stephen,
Thank you for this excellent, beautifully articulated post. It is right on the money.

My firm works with corporate clients on brand identity and package design projects all of the time. We do not initiate a single project without doing exhaustive research on the corporate brand, the competition and the customers' perception of the brand just as you've stated. How on earth could we give our clients a finished product that aligns with the brand otherwise? We'd all better know exactly what that core brand is, and revitalize it if necessary. Then we'd better make sure our internal and external marketing efforts are all in alignment with that brand.

Posted by: Ted Mininni | 02.27.07

Ted:

Thank you for the note! If only everyone was on board!

I'm lucky to have worked with a number of companies where marketing of this type has been embraced; and yet it's curious to see how many brands jump to creative without truly understanding the voice of the customer.

I've seen heads of businesses jot down "ad creative" on napkins and throw them at world-class agencies, much to everyone's disbelief, and certainly seen a lot of corners cut on things like packaging -- ever hear the "oh, yeah, sure, we did research... we did two focus groups last week..." excuse?

This is what gets marketers in trouble with the CEO, in my opinion -- by sacrificing diligence for speed, so many corners are cut that only by luck are the real insights revealed. Packaging (or advertising, or branding) without quantitative testing is like throwing darts while wearing a blindfold. Hope for the best, by all means, but don't count on it happening.

Let me know, all, if you've come across a good addition to this list -- what have you done, or seen, that has helped elicit insights that have ended up defining a brand?

Posted by: Stephen Denny | 02.27.07

Stephen,

Spot on! My whole blog is part of a campaign for more substance, and less spin. And I used the same idea of "image wrapper" branding (logo and comms. changes to cover up a crappy product) in my books the brandgym and brand vision.

The term I use for the more substantial approach you describe is "brand-led business", on which I have posted several times, including this one:
http://wheresthesausage.typepad.com/my_weblog/2006/08/apple_a_true_br_1.html

David

Posted by: David Taylor (from wheresthesausage.com) | 02.28.07

Stephen,
This is a very important post, and eloquently presented, as well.

It truly is amazing to see how many companies simply lose touch with the perception of their brands among their customers and business partners. Marketers should be in the business of constantly assessing their brands so they know when it's time to get back to their core when they stray away from it. Conducting research with regularity will also tip companies off on when it's time to rebrand. It's important to invest the human and financial capital in this enterprise. Not doing so risks total business disconnect and failure. Given today's competitive business climate, monitoring one's brand just isn't an option. It takes a long time to build a business and a relatively short time to become irrelevant, and go out of business.

Posted by: Claire Ratushny | 02.28.07

David, Claire: thanks -- the role of marketing seems to be confusing to many in non-CPG companies; in the tech fields, I've seen companies that interpret the discipline as 'sales support', 'channel support', and 'marcom' (meaning 'make some spec sheets'), as well as many who do, in fact, get it right.

If marketing draws the line in the sand at "owning the customer" -- insights, attitudes, loyalty, and sell-through (which captures channel and sales issues very elegantly) -- we have a clear mandate. So let's stay focused!

Posted by: Stephen Denny | 02.28.07

Sometimes, a new CMO or CEO comes in and it ends up being change just for the sake of change -- not a good reason alone, without going through the steps you've described.

Change and short-sightedness can be a bad marketing formula.

Posted by: David Reich | 02.28.07

Post a comment

Most Active Posts

Login to Daily Fix  |  Contact the Editor  |  RSS/XML  |  Advertising

 

Copyright 2008 © Marketing Profs, LLC   |  User Agreement  |  Privacy  |  XML Site Map