Opinion, Analysis and News from MarketingProfs Opinion. Commentary. News.
BLOG HOME RSS/XMLBOOK CLUBMARKETING PROFS
   
 
Ted Mininni Ted Mininni   Bio
09.26.06

Chocolate Phone: Sweet Spot or Sour Taste?

stumbleupon digg del.icio.us

Verizon Wireless and LG Wireless’s much-anticipated new chocolate phone was recently unveiled to lots of oohs and aahs....

Now that the phone has come off the fashion runway, and cell phone connoisseurs have had a chance to handle the new beauty, the comments are coming in. And they seem to be a curiously mixed bag of kudos and nay-says.

While many are heaping praise on the elegant, razor-thin design, and some of its features appeal, overall, the basic features of the new phone don’t seem to offer any marked improvements over existing cell phones in the marketplace. Of course it makes a great fashion statement, it’s sleek and has great hand feel. But at $100 a pop, it seems to me it should offer something extra.

Some people like the fact the Chocolate has Bluetooth technology. But a nice feature like Verizon’s Navigator location service adds an extra cost to the subscription rate. Some like the nice-sized screen the phone offers, but cite that the 1.3 megapixel camera seems to take very average quality photographs.

Yet others find the Chocolate difficult to navigate since the phone has small touch pads that are very close together, rather than buttons; a challenge for those with larger fingers. While visually appealing, if it proves difficult to touch one button v. two, or to remember how many taps one needs to give specific buttons to issue commands, that will frustrate lots of people.

Still other users report that they find the phone’s menu difficult to navigate. The phone’s ringer has a very low tone, a blessing for some and aggravation for others. It does not offer a speakerphone, which some users don’t care to have, while others do.

What’s even more interesting to me is that after shelling out $100 for the phone, accessories are not included and have to be purchased separately. Some people won’t like the idea of paying another $30 for an accessory kit that includes the necessary software to download and listen to music, a USB cable and headphones. The music downloads also have to be purchased from V Cast at $1.99 a pop. Also: dissatisfaction has been expressed in some quarters about the sound quality of the phone’s speakers when they’ve tried them out in the phone store.

Given all of these things, some cell phone users may pass on having the latest chic gadget in favor of a more functional model. The fashion-conscious among us may still opt to carry, and be seen carrying, the new Chocolate phone.

In fact, that seems to be exactly what’s happening. LG reports that in the first two months, approximately 1.7 million Chocolates have been sold around the globe. Mike Sidwell, GSM Sales and Marketing Director for LG Electronics says:

“The Chocolate phone is for the discerning customer who views mobile phones as a bold fashion statement.” He went on to attribute the phone’s success to “a combination of excellent design, clever marketing and proactive sales strategy.”

My questions are these:

1. Knowing what you know about the Chocolate phone, would you purchase it anyway because it’s the latest in fashionable electronic gadgets, has been ‘cleverly marketed and proactively sold’?

2. Or would you opt to purchase a phone with more/better features that are more conducive to your personal and professional needs?

3. How much would you be swayed by the marketing hype?

4. And do you think the Chocolate phone measures up to all of the hype it’s getting?

Should sales and marketing be used to make new products look sexy, or should they be grounded in true brand/product values? What spells success for the long term?



Read more on this subject:
Mobile Marketing Sales Mobile Marketing Sales Mobile Marketing Sales


TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.mpdailyfix.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-tb.cgi/4334

Comments

Ted,

I am swayed by marketing messages, but not just the ones communicated by a brand. For me, your post's marketing messages about the Chocolate phone are far more influential than those from Verizon Wireless and LG Wireless.

Why? Because as all marketers recognize, those messages coming from 2nd and 3rd parties are more credible. The message I received from this post is that the Chocolate phone sells style over substance, and I long ago stop worrying about my personal "cool" factor. I just want a good, inexpensive phone that works.

Posted by: Lewis Green | 09.26.06

The ads are hip and cool my teenagers really wanted to get one, and my wife because she likes chocolate. I thought the ad was well done for what it was supposed to do. Make me want one. I admit, it made me want one also.

Posted by: Keith Cash | 09.26.06

Lewis & Keith,

While marketing is supposed to deliver branded products and services to the customer: what happens when there's more hype than reality? Products that are all about style, and a little skimpy on substance might undermine a brand given time. Especially in a category like mobile phones, where a new and better mousetrap is right around the corner. Just read in the Wall Street Journal that: "T-Mobile USA is expected to launch a host of new services, including a new generation of Internet phones, to attract customers away from both wireless and land-line phone companies"
http://online.wsj.com/public/article/SB115923297434173806-vrFHLxeY9Hw3bPZUL_71NLhIC8Y_20070926.html. So the blush may already be coming off the rose, er, the chocolate!

Posted by: Ted Mininni | 09.26.06

hi, ted. from my experience in the italian market, style even for the mobile device is sooo important. but, honestly, where the difference between the chocolate and the razor and other similar devices? it seems to me that it's all a matter of style and forget the features. is it right? i think no but, again, it sells.

Posted by: gianandrea facchini | 09.26.06

Hi Gianandrea,

There isn't any doubt that many people are buying the Chocolate phone because of its sleekness and styling. No doubt at all. Many people here in the U.S., Europe and the Pacific Rim are very style conscious and want the latest gadgets. The question is, are they disappointed afterward? And if they are, will they buy their next mobile phone from Verizon/LG? Probably not. Then there are people like Lewis and me, who want performance. Forget the styling and the hype, just give us a phone with features we want and need.

There are already new phones on the horizon. Check out the Wall St. Journal link to see what else is coming. It all makes me wonder how long the public will continue to hanker for Chocolate!

Posted by: Ted Mininni | 09.26.06

Is the Chocolate brown? It looks black to me, but I haven't seen it in person yet.

Posted by: Ann Handley | 09.26.06

Hi Ann,

It's black. According to LG, it looked good enough to eat (like a bar of chocolate, hence the name. Sweet!

Posted by: Ted Mininni | 09.26.06

Too bad...I'd actually buy it if it was brown (brown being the new black, you know). Before I saw the rendering, I was actually psyched about the idea of a brown phone called "Chocolate." Ah well...

Posted by: Ann Handley | 09.26.06

I'm with Lewis...well I'm almost over being "cool." I just want a phone that works, holds its charge and takes pictures. My husband is 5 years younger and he thought the Chocolate was totally cool. Whatever.

My 5 year old daughter said the other day...
"Mom? Have you ever noticed chocolate looks like poop?"

Posted by: Tammy Strnatka | 09.26.06

My boyfriend has the Chocolate phone and I have used it a number of times. For over $100 it hasn't lived up to its hype. The buttons are hard to get used to and the picture-taking capabilities are terrible. I've talked to him while he was using the BlueTooth and the sound quality was also terrible. He said he could hear me fine, but I couldn't make out what he was saying.
I think Verizon and LG should have developed a better product before hyping it up like they did.

Posted by: Amanda Wheeler | 09.27.06

My service is with Cingular wireless and I use a motorola V551 - I primarily purchased it for the bluetooth capability and it has been functional. However I wish that, sometimes, manufacturers (in all industries) would concentrate more on function than on form. I want a cell phone that has 4-5 bars no matter where I am. Put a tower in my house if you have to.

@Ann: It is my understanding that in Europe it is brown and in the U.S. it is black. Who knows why?

Posted by: Parley Kennelly | 09.27.06

Thanks, Amanda and Parley for your observations. As with every new tech product, there are bound to be pros and cons. However, you've both reaffirmed my point: that when the hype wears off and people actually use a product every day, they had better find it functional. Or else, when they go to replace the product, they will purchase another brand. That's why it's always best to ground our marketing messages to deliver on a true and realistic brand promise and not base them on pure hype!

Posted by: Ted Mininni | 09.27.06

I've been with Verizon for many many years but even with their contract renewal deal, the Chocolate costs a lot more than the just as popular razr v3m(free!). After I looked at the specs and a few reviews, because I wanted to know what all the hoopla was about over the Chocolate, the lack of speakerphone, goofy touch pad button thing, etc I stuck with another Samsung phone that is more feature packed...the Samsung a930. Weird looking phone (I named it Darth Phone) but it feels great, the sound is delightfuly loud and clear, I can blast music from my external speakers which are tiny but loud. So in the end, hype was no match for actually functionality because I don't want to be stuck with a cute but useless phone for two years.

Posted by: Sarah | 09.27.06

I'm a (Sprint/)Nextel user and have a 3 to 4-yr-old phone that does what I need, but isn't really stylish in any way. However, I'm hoping to acquire a newer, sleeker phone in the near future, but will still look more for features than design, even if that means shopping around a lot.

I've never seen a Chocolate, but with what I've read and after seeing the ads, I don't think it lives up to the hype. I think Nokia always had the right idea about offering a ton of covers and ways to customize its phones so people could integrate their own sense of style. What happened to that concept (just Version 2.0)? Unless I can actually take a bite out of the phone while I'm using it, I wouldn't get the Chocolate. I'll stick to Godiva, or Hershey's on a tight budget, and my trusty Motorola I90C ;)

Ted, great point about technology and the ability for a company to come up with a new mousetrap right around the corner. There really is no competitive advantage when it comes to technology anymore, except complete understanding of the consumer. And how fickle can us consumers be, ya know?

Posted by: Daniel Monday | 10.02.06

p.s. Why can't a mobile phone company deliver a unit that's both stylish and functional? I mean, look at the iPod...a functional fashion statement.

Posted by: Daniel Monday | 10.02.06

Thanks, Sarah and Daniel for your great comments. As the president of a design firm, make no mistake: I love great design. However, style and design without being user friendly, and offering great features and real value go just so far. Technology should allow companies to simplify their products, add desirable features and help us to simplify our lives. That would be a real boon to the consumer, don't you think?

Posted by: Ted Mininni | 10.02.06

I totally agree Ted. Technology should simplify and empower, not complicate and restrain. I feel that way about my new digital camera. It's a great little camera, with a lot of neat features, but so many features that I feel like I need to read the entire manual a couple of times and take a course just to use it properly. Most people who get digital cameras aren't professional photographers and have no idea when to use certain settings and such, much less take the time to set them when taking pictures. Cameras should capture moments in time, but often those moments come and go too fast to get the settings on a camera just right. But I digress. Technology should make things easier and more efficient, not more difficult.

I think Inspector Gadget has it best - a phone integrated into his hand! No need for style, unless he sports some nice new gloves. Minus all the obvious drawbacks of embedding a cell phone into your hand, I think that would great to have, next to a helicopter that comes out of your head of course. :)

Posted by: Daniel Monday | 10.02.06

Ted,

it's called chocolate becuase the asian launch was on valentine's day... the only reason it was named was a marketing endeavor. white chocolate is already in the UK.

Posted by: julie | 10.18.06

Is the Chocolate phone that bad? I'm not sure who to believe some people say it has a speaker phone and others say it does not. Oh and by the way how much songs can 128 Mb phone hold?

Posted by: Lis | 01.06.07

I just purchased the Strawberry Chocolate (was not pursuaded by the hype as I had rarely seen the commercials) and I must say I love it!! Actually, I love the sleek style of the phone. Its easy to carry and fits nicely everywhere!! You have to get used to the touch buttons they are very sensitive but you can change the sensitiviy level. All in all, I'm very happy with the phone and will be using it for quite some time

Posted by: Tonya | 05.26.07

Do not get the chocolate phone it is absoluetly terrible and inconvinient! Me and one of my friends both have a chocolate and we both agree that the phone is horrible and a pointless electronic to have. My friend has went into Verizon to get a new phone three times in a month because hers has continuosly broken. We both agree that the camera doesn't work well, its doesnt stay charged for long, the screen gets scrached easily, and its way too sensitive. We both got it because it looked cool. However, its a waste of your well worked for money, when you see a chocolate, look the other way and go find something worth your time and money.

Posted by: Haylie and Paige | 07.20.07

the chocolate is bad. if i was looking for a new phone i wouold get the razor it works better and its better looking too.

Posted by: paige | 07.20.07

It does have a speakerphone!!!! every one is saying that it doesnt, but it does. when you call someone, while its ringing, press the picture button on the side. it should work! it works for me.

Posted by: Christina | 08.10.07

I love my chocolate phone!!!. Alot of people say that it breaks way to easy, but if you don't slide it up hard and care-less it WILL NOT BREAK!!. and I've had my phone for 6 months and not one scratch or problem. I have it in black cherry, AND I SIMPLY LOVE IT!!!!

Posted by: Athena | 10.26.07

Thanks for your comments, ladies. You've judged the Chocolate phone based on your use of it and whether you like the features it has or not. Consumers ultimately decide whether a product offers the value they're paying for, or not. Then they spread the word as you've done. Word of mouth is a powerful form of advertising. Thanks for adding to the conversation, Julie, Lis, Tonya, Paige, Haylie and Athena.

Posted by: Ted Mininni | 10.26.07

Post a comment

Most Active Posts

Login to Daily Fix  |  Contact the Editor  |  RSS/XML  |  Advertising

 

Copyright 2008 © Marketing Profs, LLC   |  User Agreement  |  Privacy  |  XML Site Map