Opinion, Analysis and News from MarketingProfs Opinion. Commentary. News.
BLOG HOME RSS/XMLBOOK CLUBMARKETING PROFS
   
 
Tom Ehrenfeld Tom Ehrenfeld   Bio
08.29.06

5 Guidelines on Writing

stumbleupon digg del.icio.us

As a business writer, I’ve always cared as much about writing as I do about business. In fact, I took the discipline of writing seriously long before seeing the practice of business as a dynamic activity. Today I care about both....

And so, when looking for good business writing in other outlets, I look for two things: insight into business, and good writing. In a former life I was a writer and editor for Inc. Magazine, where, for a while, I edited three columns from authorities for each issue. While the job was tough for me at first, I loved it, and had the chance to work with great folks like Jim Collins, Mary Baechler, Marion McGovern, Michael Hammer, Amy Miller, Roxanne Coady, and many others.

Over time I developed a set of guidelines to help prospective authors get a head-start. Though I wrote this set of rules years ago, they still pass along most of what I know and believe about business writing (or simply, writing.) So this late summer seems a good time to share. The following guidelines are copied word-for-word from the copy I would send people (along with a handful of our best columns to demonstrate what we wanted by example):

Each month we publish three columns by entrepreneurs, policy-makers, and other small business authorities who have something to say to the Inc. audience. These columns are designed to open up the magazine to a range of voices and to allow our readers to speak directly to one another. Unlike the more descriptive, prescriptive, or narrative-driven feature articles, these columns are generally written in the first person, designed around an argument, and address a broad range of topics related to the new economy. We tend to work on columns about four months before they are published. Some columns of a more timely nature can be worked on closer to publication, but we will never be current. Topical, but not current. Columns run from 750 to 1200 words. We hope you will produce a great column for us. Here are some rough guidelines that may help.

Write about what you know. What have you learned about the process of growing a company? And how did you learn this lesson? Those are the two most important questions you will address in your piece, and they are directly related. There must be a sense that no one else could write your column. Your conclusions must come from direct experience or from observation. Your beliefs and ideals are important, yes, but it is crucial that you defend them in a business context. Speculation doesn’t belong here. You are writing to businesspeople who will always be asking, “where’s the beef?”

Columns are structured simply. In the first two or three paragraphs you should tell the reader what the column is about. What are you going to prove? Then you will spend the rest of the column elaborating your message. You will say what you know, and then you will show how you know it. Finally, sum up with a conclusion about what you have learned.

Know your audience. Never forget that you are writing for businesspeople who read Inc. to learn about and to celebrate the process of growing a business. It’s okay to talk about personal stuff like divorce or impersonal issues like national health policy—as long as you keep the audience in mind. One CEO wrote a column describing her foray into professional boxing, because it taught her a lesson about growing her company (that growth must be managed and goals must be set internally). One attorney wrote about a new theory of economic returns. The common thread is that they had something to share with our audience. There must be a sense that your column is running in Inc. because Inc. is the perfect—only—fit for it.

Surprise us. We don’t want to hear that top managers must get involved and that people are your most important asset, that regulations are stifling economic growth, or that every company should set up a web page in an increasingly global economy. Think “man bites dog.” The best columns are surprising, provocative, counterintuitive, orginal. They start a conversation rather than end one, they provoke an argument among smart businesspeople. If you want to tackle a current debate, ask yourself what new thinking you’ll bring. Many of the columns set up a straw man in the beginning—an assumption that they want to attack. We really don’t care what position you take. We don’t have a party line. We only care about publishing good material that brings new thinking to a relevant subject.

About writing. Don’t worry about how your column will sound. Worry instead about what you have to say. Of course we want well-written essays in the magazine. But the most important thing is that you have something to say. Focus your attention on the question: What is your message? Simplify, simplify, simplify. The best columns are the most direct. Don’t worry about your voice. It cannot help but emerge when you tell your story. Don’t be self-conscious. Just say what you have to say. We can always help you structure your message—but finding out what you have to say is your job.

Here’s what you can expect from us. Because the bulk of our columns are written by people who don’t write much, we often edit them aggressively. If you column arrives in pristine condition, we won’t touch it. If it needs cosmetic work, we’ll trim the adjectives and make the tenses correct. For those people who have something to say but no time to write it, we might interview you, tape the conversation, transcribe the chat and edit it into a column that you will then review. Our preference is always to do the least amount of work—not because we are lazy, but because the best columns tend to be those where the writing is primarily done by the author.

We will however do everything possible to make your column work, including sending it back to you for major revisions if necessary. Some columns, unfortunately, will not make it—even after work on your part. We don’t like when that happens. But it does. Here’s the best way to insure that your column will work: read and study what we have already published. Enclosed with these guidelines are a handful of columns that have worked in the past. We would love, in the future, to be sending out one of yours in this mailing.



Read more on this subject:
Content Content


TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.mpdailyfix.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-tb.cgi/3864

Comments

I saw the title of this post and groaned, but I'm glad I took the time to read it. So many times writer's guidelines are about picking the right word or structure a sentence. Thank you for writing guidelines that address what really matters, having something to say and saying it in an interesting way.

Posted by: Kristine Shreve | 08.29.06

I have found that a key to writing is to not talk too much about yourself. If you mention 'I' too much then you are not really focusing on your readers.

Subheads

Another key is to use lots of subheads rather than to go on and on in paragraphs of prose.

Mike

Posted by: Michael Stelzner | 08.29.06

As a former reporter for a daily, a book editor, a magazine editor and a working free-lancer, the guidelines are basic JM 101 but nevertheless great starting points, especially for inexperienced writers.

I was blessed that during my editing life, our writers made their livings practicing the craft because
at the end of the day a good piece equals a good story told in a compelling way. Rules and guidelines can't help non-story tellers much.

Posted by: Lewis Green | 08.29.06

Your comment made me laugh, Kristine, since I obsessed over that headline before I published it this morning. I thought it just didn't quite capture it...but nothing else I tried worked, either, in my mind. Nothing quite captured the essence of Tom's post...so in the end I stuck with the original title!

Anyway -- thanks for the laugh!

Posted by: Ann Handley | 08.29.06

Well said, and inspiring too, Tom! the first three are brain basws tactics at their best! Thanks for the post.

Brain Based Business

Posted by: Ellen Weber | 08.29.06

Tom, after posting I can't seem to get your guidelines out of my head. Your Post has become that song whose title you long since forgot but the melody is mesmorizing.

All the thinking and rereading stole a good chunk of my day but this is a writing and thinking day, so it turns out to be a good thing.

My comment was written in haste, as so many are. I think it's a measure of this medium. However, it should never be the measure for those of us who pride ourselves on our communications skills.

Hence, I owe you an apology. Mea culpa.

While I believe writers are, and they cannot be made, their writing can be improved, and I owe whatever fine-tuning I possess to those editors who were smart, straight-forward and good writers themselves. Jack Hart, an editor and writing coach at both the "New York Times" and the Portland "Oregonian", molded my clumsiness into something publishable years ago.

From the excellence of your guidelines (far deeper than JM 101), I suspect you have earned the gratitude of many writers and their readers.

In the future, I must not allow the medium to influence my writing to such a degree that my words no longer are thoughtful. It does us all good to read beneath the text to better understand the words and the person behind them.

Posted by: Lewis Green | 08.29.06

Thanks everyone for your comments.

And Lewis, don't worry, you still had me at "basic JM 101." It's nice just to have readers read and to feel inclined to reply, and I appreciate both posts!

Now let's all keep one another honest by reading everyone's work carefully and helping each other out with more good feedback.

Posted by: Tom Ehrenfeld | 08.29.06

Interested. Rob.

Posted by: Robert Thomas Maclagan | 08.31.06

Post a comment

Most Active Posts

Login to Daily Fix  |  Contact the Editor  |  RSS/XML  |  Advertising

 

Copyright 2008 © Marketing Profs, LLC   |  User Agreement  |  Privacy  |  XML Site Map