|
I am a total sucker for community theater, especially musical theater, and especially middle or high school productions. What I love
...isn't so much the corny show tunes or the predictable story lines, but the fact that the kids have such energy for taking risks. I was thinking of this over the weekend when I saw back-to-back performances of Oklahoma at my son's middle school.
Adolescence is really tough. There's probably no time in your life when you are more prone to self-doubt and insecurity than adolescence, and there's no time (at least for boys) when your voice performs less than predictably. It's easier to blend in with the crowd than to call attention to yourself; it's easier to not set yourself apart.
But still: some kids are willing to risk what amounts to "it all" for them. They risk the embarrassment of belting it out with less-than-perfect pitch (and hearing the snickers when they fail). They risk the indignity of wearing goofy dresses and hair bows, or dorky straight-legged jeans and cowboy hats. They risk letting others see them as uncool and compromised. They put themselves on the line.
The 14-year-old male lead sang Curly's opening number, "Oh What a Beautiful Morning" with a voice that squeaked and faltered and sometimes failed him completely. The "Persian goodbye" kiss between Ali Hakim and Ado Annie was as awkward as any kiss between two 14-year-olds would be (especially one with an auditorium full of parents watching).
But of course, it didn't matter. The point is that it was still a great show – not as the critics would deem it, perhaps, but because the kids themselves were loving it. It was hard not to catch their passion and optimism, especially as you couldn't watch them without wondering what inner teenage demons they had to quash in order to fearlessly place themselves on that stage that night, wearing a long blue frilly dress, straw hat, and belting out, "I'm Just a Girl Who Can't Say No…."
There's a lesson there for bloggers, too. A month or so ago, the videoblog Rocketboom featured an interview with Dave Winer, who talked (among other things) about the nature of so-called amateurs. Dave, who played a lead role in developing many Web 2.0 tools like feeds and podcasting, said: "Amateur is not below professional. It's just another way of doing [media]. The root of the word amateur is love, and someone who does something for love is an amateur….
"If you're an amateur you have less conflict of interest and less reason not to tell your truth than if you have to pay the bills and please somebody else." (Thanks for Amy Gahran for the reference.)
In that interview, Winer was talking about traditional journalists versus more grassroots media – like citizen journalists or bloggers. But you could apply his comments to blogging in a more general sense: when it's done with integrity and with heart, it feels honest and real.
The kids in Oklahoma this weekend maybe not have been perfect or polished, just like some of the best blog writing isn't perfect or polished. But just as for the performers, it's a strength, not a weakness. (Or maybe it's weakness and a strength.)
In blogging, too, we may not always be pitch-perfect. The writing isn't always complete or comprehensive or polished. But if you write with passion and truth and communicate honestly, your audience will be on its feet.
|
Comments
Great story, Ann. You're right on the mark here. As a reader, I'll take passionate writing over precise writing everyday. As a blogger, I hope my readers do the same:-) In the end, it's all about the conversations, right?
Posted by: Mike Sansone | 05.14.06
Great analogy, Ann
Yeah, there will always be a strong demand for polished, professional content -- but personally I've found the general level of interest in unpolished "amateur" content to be surprisingly high. For lots of reasons.
The two complement each other well, I think.
- Amy Gahran
RightConversation.com
Contentious.com
IReporter.org
Editor, Poynter's E-Media Tidbits
Posted by: Amy Gahran | 05.15.06
Brilliant post, Ann! I've had much the sme type of response (though you put words to it!) watching the annual production of Shakespeare plays at my daughter's school.
There's something far more essential to the productions by the 7th and 8th graders of Julius Ceasar or MacBeth than most professional ones I've seen--even the ones I love. Most polished professional productions are much more about the director's interpretation of the play or the virtuoso performance of the stars rather than the play itself, which is almost taken for granted.
But when kids of 12/13 take on a Shakespearean character, they tend to do so with a purer focus on what's going on. The tend to become the charater more intensely than many professionals, and I often feel that seeing these productions is like re-discovering the essence of these great plays.
As Hamlet's Mother impatiently asks of Polonius, "More matter, with less art."
Posted by: Tom Ehrenfeld | 05.15.06
"But if you write with passion and truth and communicate honestly, your audience will be on its feet."
And closing with a powerful statement that can't be denied works wonders as well ;)
Posted by: Mack Collier | 05.15.06
"All the world's a stage..."
Thanks for the incredible metaphor. As a businessman, novice blogger (and president of my local community theater) I thank you for the excellent post! You're right. I'm amazed sometimes at the time and energy people put into 'amateur' community productions when there is no monetary profit to be gained - just for the love of doing it.
Posted by: Tom Vander Well | 05.15.06
Thanks for all the comments and kind words, Mike, Amy, Tom 1, Tom 2 & Mack. Much appreciated.
When I was just starting out as a journalist a crusty old editor told me that my early effort was "amateurish." Guess I'd take that as a kudo now!
Posted by: Ann Handley | 05.16.06
Hi Ann,
I have seen many an amateur production, both childrens and adults performances, and am forever bewilderd once reading a crit from a so called 'professional'. I often wonder if the crit was actually taking in what they are seeing, if they see the efforts, the raw talent and commitment from a small group of people who are passionate about their art.
Yes notes can be off key, cues can be missed, awkward silence can occur and technical mishaps ar prome. These are all part and parcel of amateur theatre and what makes amateur productions fun and entertaining. One must also wonder if a crit would be so harsh and unforgiving if a crit was looking in a mirror? :)
Posted by: Leslie Worthington | 06.04.07
Hi Ann,
I have seen many an amateur production, both children's and adult performances, and am forever bewildered once reading a crit from a so called 'professional'. I often wonder if the crit was actually taking in what they are seeing, if they see the efforts, the raw talent and commitment from a small group of people who are passionate about their art.
Yes notes can be off key, cues can be missed, awkward silence can occur and technical mishaps are prone. These are all part and parcel of amateur theatre and what makes amateur productions fun and entertaining. One must also wonder if a crit would be so harsh and unforgiving if a crit was looking in a mirror? :)
Posted by: Leslie Worthington | 06.04.07