Opinion, Analysis and News from MarketingProfs Opinion. Commentary. News.
BLOG HOME RSS/XMLBOOK CLUBMARKETING PROFS
   
 
David Armano David Armano   Bio
05.03.06

Delight = Brand + Experience

stumbleupon digg del.icio.us

In the Interactive Marketing space, there are a lot of buzzwords being thrown around....

“Synergy” has been replaced by “Experience”—and having a differentiated brand seems more important than ever these days. Then of course there’s the customer. We want to do things that are “customer-centric”—which hopefully leads to delight, demand and ultimately loyalty. It all sounds great.

Now that I’ve established some “credibility” by throwing a few choice buzzwords around myself—allow me to get to the heart of the matter. Effective Interactive Marketing can hypothetically be boiled down to executing against three truths:

1. Draw the customer in—get their attention.
2. Reward them with meaningful interactions that somehow influence their lives positively.
3. Provide them with valuable experiences they want to use and are inclined to share with others.

...And of course all of this all needs to be measurable and results-oriented.

I’ve left some parts out intentionally to keep this really simple. But here’s the food for thought. Who are the kinds of people needed to do this type of work? And how can they work together?

Let’s see—it’s interactive, so you need people that live and breathe technology. Since technology is involved—it has lots of moving parts. This means you need people who know how to design experiences and understand things like usability. But it’s also marketing—so you need folks who understand insights, brands and the art of storytelling. The list goes on and on...

Point I’m making is that a great deal of true collaboration needs to go on behind the scenes in order to end up with the coveted “delighted customer.” And I have a hunch that marketing/advertising firms are grappling with getting the “brand-types,” “design-types” and “technology-types” to all work in sync as we try help our clients grow.

Sure, this sounds peachy—but in reality authentic collaboration is messy business. Have you ever been in a meeting with a creative, techie, and brand strategist mixing it up? It’s like the tower of Babel—everyone’s speaking a different language.

But when this all does come together—the end result is powerful and difficult to ignore. Point in case: nikewomen.com. Too early to tell how this will be measured—but the combination of brand engagement, commerce, design, entertainment, etc. enabled by technology all adds up to a delightful experience.

delight_formula.jpg

As agencies evolve and disciplines become increasingly blurred, something tells me that the quality of what we’re seeing in digital spaces is only the tip of the tower so to speak. Hope that last part didn’t get lost in translation.



Read more on this subject:



TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.mpdailyfix.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-tb.cgi/1790

Comments

Excellent point, David. What you propose is more than "breaking down the walls." It is, what I call "collaboration with contrarians"--contrarians in world view, in training, in abilities, etc.

This is exactly the new level of collaboration proposed by Tom Peters in his book, "Re-imagine," where he challenges business to do more than re-invent itself; it must re-imagine itself.

Personally I believe for business to succeed in this new rough-and-tumble, mix-it-up transition from an industrial-based economy to a knowledge-based economy, now naked to global forces, we need the innovation that can result when true contrarian collaboration occurs.

Posted by: Sandra Eggers | 05.03.06

LOVE that phrase -- "contrarian collaboration." It really paints a picture.

Posted by: Ann Handley | 05.03.06

Great stuff. We're all feeling this. If you can package a magic formula that will help companies genuinely reinvent companies so that they can behave in a truly customer-centric manner, you'll be able to mint money.

This isn't so hard for smaller companies... but horrendous for larger ones. The real problem is that most businesses go through evolution, not revolution.

Until executive leadership truly appreciate the urgency and importance of synchronizing the organization AROUND the delivery of consistently great customer experience (instead of being operational or task-focused silo organizations), we will continue to sit in endless "collaborative" meetings. Calgon! Take me away!!!

Posted by: Leigh Duncan | 05.03.06

Leigh,

Please send some of that Calgon my way when you're done with it.

Good points about this being relevant to company size. I would also add company culture. Some big companies have this stuff ingrained. We all know who the examples are—they make things like iPods and fashion forward athletic apparel etc.

To Sandra's point—I love the term contrarian collaboration. It's about getting real. Getting real means getting your hands dirty—all in the name of producing a great experience.

Posted by: David Armano | 05.03.06

David,

Nice article. Steve Jobs comes to mind as he forces ruthless focus on delightful consumer experiences. And he drives all functional organizations to deliver on the promise that the cool ad compaigns like the iPod billboards communicate.

Wish more B2B high tech companies had that kind of focus. Thank you for the needed reminder and call to action.

Sridhar

Posted by: Sridhar Ramanathan | 05.03.06

Yeah, it helps when you can do all of those things yourself. There aren't many of us yet, but we're out there.

Posted by: Jim Kukral | 05.04.06

Post a comment

Most Active Posts

Login to Daily Fix  |  Contact the Editor  |  RSS/XML  |  Advertising

 

Copyright 2008 © Marketing Profs, LLC   |  User Agreement  |  Privacy  |  XML Site Map