|
With "Marketing 2.0" in full swing, it's a good time to reflect as we move forward...
It was in early February over six years ago when I truly began to feel the dizzying effects of the dot-com economy first-hand. I began working in the online space back in '97, but it was in 2000 that the internet industry seemed to hit critical mass. Everyone I knew was buzzing about their newfound stock options and career opportunities. The potential of the internet seemed bottomless.
I joined agency.com (see photos) at around the same time.
Back then, we were just another professional services firm positioned to help guide our clients through the interactive space. The company was founded by two "Silicon Alley" entrepreneurs before there even was a bubble.

But when the bubble burst did hit us—it hit hard. Our high-flying stock was instantly reduced to a fraction of the initial price, we closed one office after another, and our numbers dwindled to less than a third of our peak size. It all happened in real time, and I had a front row seat. The only reason I survived was because we still had a handful of good clients—and we quickly re-focused our efforts on relentlessly demonstrating ROI to clients in tangible ways.
There is a point to this nostalgic tale.
As I look around at the business climate lately I'm reminded of those heady dot-com days. I'm not the only one. A recent article in Businessweek captured similar sentiments. So, to be clear—we're in a different time now vs. back then, but what can be learned from this kind of experience? I'll try to take a crack at it using a fitting metaphor for the "wild west" we once knew as the dot-com era:
The Good:
the bubble wasn't all bad. In fact, there was a great deal of creativity and positive thinking that permeated the atmosphere. People weren't afraid to take risks, if you had an idea, it was pretty easy to be heard. We were willing to try things, to experiment. As an employee, you felt an investment was being made to see you grow. And many of us worked our tails off, forging strong bonds in the process. There were some really positive side effects around all of this.
The Bad:
I've always been a creative—but what I noticed about the dot-com era was that I was working with a lot of people who had little former experience in what they were currently practicing. Folks seemed more motivated by stock options and perks than by the work itself. It wasn't uncommon to find yourself working alongside someone who was doing something completely different at their past job, or they were fresh out of school with little to no real-world experience. Meetings easily got derailed and there was a lack of focus. And lets not forget the salaries. I knew some people who still aren't close to the short lived salaries they had back then.
The Ugly:
In a word—arrogance. We thought we knew better than our clients, that somehow we were “enlightened”. How quickly that changed. Even the “poster boy” of dot-com arrogance, Jeff Dachis of the original Razorfish changed his tune by 2001. But all of us played a role. For my part—I’m sorry too. We should have all known better.
So back to present times—does anyone else feel just a hint of that “wild west” climate again?
Certainly much has changed since the late 90’s. The internet is a finally a respectable business model—and many brands understand this. Advertising is being turned on it’s head—the 30 second spot is slowly losing the unchallenged influence it once enjoyed. Product Design has experienced an all-out renaissance. Consumers control how they choose to interact with brands—they now have the power. Technology no longer drives—it enables. Design has gone mainstream—companies like Target and Apple have seen to this. I could go on...
Wow. It’s 2006 and I can’t believe I survived the downturn only to have continued working in the same field as I was back in 2000. And here’s what I’ve learned:
The creative spirit was good.
The arrogance was bad.
Let's re-capture that creative spirit, mix it with the wisdom we've all gained since—and do some things for people that somehow makes life just a little bit better. Hmmmm... humility+innovation. That could be an interesting combination.
|
Comments
Indeed, I am catching a whiff of that old hype and that old arrogance.
I spent my 1996-1999 at K2, which was one of the first interactive agencies to go public. We didn't have things like Razor scooters in the office, but we did other silly things during the boom like flying across the country to crash a Razorfish party and making trips to Toys R Us to buy toys for the creatives. Ahh...those were the days.
A lot of the arrogance came from high-flying ad-supported sites (I won't name names - everyone knows who they are). If you balked in the slightest at paying their ridiculously high CPMs for online media, they'd call you to tell you your price just doubled and that you'd better sign the contract before they changed their minds again. It was wack.
I'm not saying it's back to that level again, but it's getting there. All we need is another huge wave of ad dollars to set the whole thing in motion again. And that influx of ad dollars is nearly upon us.
Posted by: Tom Hespos | 05.16.06
Ugh....I see more and more bubble 'survivors' sounding the same warnings both of you are. Hopefully the results will be different this time.
Posted by: Mack Collier | 05.16.06
Excellent post, David. And great comments, Tom and Mack.
I spent the "Good & Bad Old Days" at ClickZ.com -- plenty arrogant, admittedly, and then plenty flat-out LUCKY to have sold it in 2000, *this close* to the crash and *this close* to screwing the whole thing up. Since I'm on a show-tune kick this week....I'm "a sadder but wiser girl" because of it ("Music Man").
Anyway -- I think the big difference between the late '90s and now is summed up by David: "Technology no longer drives—it enables." Seems to me that we aren't as willing to swig from the fountain of Cool Technology as Business Model.
Posted by: Ann Handley | 05.16.06
Yes, the Internet is back, but I do see a difference between the growth now and the surge back then. Back then, people w/out any real biz experience scoffed at such outmoded "so-yesterday" notions such as "profit" and "revenue growth."
Now, I see that the ideas that achieve credibility are the ones tested by experience. We're no longer in the panic phase of confronting a new beast. Today, we know the animal and are much more familiar with its behaviors.
Posted by: Jonathan Kranz | 05.16.06
Mack,
No worries—this time around will be different. I think the "survival" experience has made us all better people. Really what it comes down to is combining the creative spirit with grounded common sense.
I'm encouraged with what I see in the business world these days and I think these are exciting times we live in.
Time to put our collective experience to good use!
Posted by: David Armano | 05.16.06
My name is Todd and I am dot.com survivor. One difference between then and now is having the infrastructure and real-time data to truly deliver an online storefront. I remember trying to order a Mac online way back in 1999 from a discount reseller. After having trouble with the site I called customer service only to have the rep tell me the site "was lying to me", i.e. the posted inventory didn't match actual inventory. Also, I don't think investors are throwing bushelfuls of money at the space expecting triple-digit returns. I think we all know now that the i-web didn't create any new customers, only a new way of connecting with them. I look trepidatiously forward to UNIMEDIA.
Posted by: Todd Ziaja | 05.16.06
Word.
Posted by: karl | 05.16.06